SOR I - Section 3! YOUR THOUGHTS (1 Viewer)

[04242894]

ha!! i herd of a school where the whole hall just walked out after the reading time...it was beyond ridiculous, but yes hopefully it will sought it self out

 

[Shoom]

FUCKING HELL, FOR SECTION THREE DID THE CHRISTIANITY THING RIGHT.


YOU KNOW PART OF THE QUOTE WAS ' he burnt our hearts and opened to us the criptures or some cra like that.


I USED THAT AS QUOTE FOR AN ESSAY ON ST FRANCIS

ALL I DID WAS TALK ABOUT ST FRANCIS EN I AD TO TALK ABOUT SU WORSHIP


ZOMG0/20 AND I FAILED

 

[emilyo]

I did judaism and it was pretty clear what section of syllabus it was from - but i planned to do christianity which was to vague to decifer. All in all my thoughts are F YOU BOARD OF STUDIES YOU STUPID VAGUE ONE RELATED TEXT LOVING BASTARDS.

 

[Hadn]

It seemed to me the question was a little vauge, and that I was unable to pull out as much information from the christianity text they gave us... Hmm does seem like the board pulled a slick one on us. But I did alright on other sections so lets hope rambling prevails and i get a few marks from it

 

[danielle..]

i read the questions for section 3 and i honestly thought i had the wrong exam paper :S

 

[Gypo09]

it wasn't a part of the syllabus... sounds like something out of two unit..... the BOS fucked up and personally i dont think there is a way they can really fix it. we may have spend the hours studying for english instead... it was total crap.

 

[lcosta-2420]

Our schools doing an investigation but im pretty sure it was a studies of religion 2 questiion that they put in our paper... by accident...
assholes

 

[shell..]

Section III Christianity was ridiculous.
Even if you knew the whole syllabus it didn't link in appropriately anywhere.
Completely open and vague with no sense of direction.
A definite problem when you're attempting to gather your thoughts into some sort of logical order.

My SOR co-ordinator was part of writing the syllabus and she thought it was a terrible irrelevant question. Do over?

 

[ethanclarke]

god dammit. i hate re. i talked about all 3 areas in christianity..rather shockingly i might add. i didnt know what the shit they wanted....so much for band 6 haha

 

[Blonx]

wtf that was the worst fucking question ever.

i just blabbed on about sexual, environmental ethics and wesak (buddhism)

and how they relate to the 8 fold path, enlightenment and nirvana

 

[jaymz001]

Ehhh in the end. We will all get scalled.

 

[ethanclarke]

Our schools doing an investigation but im pretty sure it was a studies of religion 2 questiion that they put in our paper... by accident...
assholes

hey leah are they are really? who!

 

[Tronester]

Creative writing all over again.

 

[jet]

wtf?!
there goes me wanting to get a band 6.
or is it a band 4 because its 1 unit.
i dont know.
but

Band 6 responce, allocating 20 marks to someone with an incredible freaking mind that can write perfect bullshit for 20 pages for section three in their religion exam.
20 marks for Band 6 students, or E4 i dont know.

It's a band 6. E4 is for Extension subjects.

 

[veruschka]

These are my thoughts about Section 3: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[missbliss91]

all i can say is. WHAT. THE. HELL?????

I was expecting it to be based around a dot point, so in the exam i though we had to link it to a dot point, which I did. Now in hindsight I realise mine won't be any where in-depth enough as we were meant to link it to everything we had learn't.
I think the question would have been alright if i knew how to answer it

 

[Missy.15]

Omg, so agree with every!!
It was a terrible question. My teacher said it was "Left field".
I did Christianity and only wrote 2 pages. I had no idea so i talked about baptism??

TERRIBLE!

 

[Navin]

Band 6 Responce?

Pretty sure she actually mean BullS**t by the BS not band six

 

[cole-]

i wasted 15 minutes trying to figure out if it was a trick question

100% for everyone.

 

[Cloesd]

The glory that was section 3.

.