and what do all the leagues that don't have a premier league-style oligarchy have in common?having 3 teams battle it out for supremacy is perfectly fine
the problem is when those 3 teams never change
I know this was a little dig at me but its still loland what do all the leagues that don't have a premier league-style oligarchy have in common?
they're shit.
if you want to sacrifice quality of play for an even playing field, buy an a-league season ticket.
i like the a-league...and quality doesnt mean enjoyment...look at the NBA im sure its heaps tactical but its boring as shitand what do all the leagues that don't have a premier league-style oligarchy have in common?
they're shit.
if you want to sacrifice quality of play for an even playing field, buy an a-league season ticket.
whats your definition of "soon"?Why is everyone worried about Liverpool and how they're going?, bottom line is that the domination of the big 4 clubs in the EPL could soon be over (tipping in maybe a year or 2) with the emergence of teams such as Spurs, Man City, Villa, Everton, Fulham and Birmingham could soon be challenging for titles. Whether they can maintain that challenge is the question... I still reckon Tottenham are still looking good for 4th place at the end of the season
LOL go watch the la liga its only ever 2 teams and ligue 1 its been 1team for ages until last season also in bundesliga only been bayern until recently.whats the point of EPL? its only ever 3 teams...
spurs: kranjar, modric, defoewhats your definition of "soon"?
i could see man city challenging for titles in the next 2-3 if they continue in their current path, but the rest still need something more for it to be a possibility
spurs/villa/everton winning the prem in the next 5 years is almost laughable. the difference between your arsenal/manu/chel squad and your spurs/villa/everton squad is too big atm. players like fabregas and rooney would make the 1st team at any club they played for. spurs/villa/everton dont have these kind of players
until they buy some or train some up, prem is outta the question (unless the chelsea plane crashes into the manu plane over an arsenal vs liverpool pre season friendly)
im not saying they arent good, but i dont consider any of those players to be in the same league as a fabregas, rooney, torres, lampard, gerrard, drogba, etc.spurs: kranjar, modric, defoe
villa: agbonlahor,
everton: arteta, cahill, fellaini, baines, rodwell, bilyaletdinov.
there's a few that pop into my head.
quality doesn't only mean enjoyment - it means everything. why do you watch the a-league say... over the NSW premier league?i like the a-league...and quality doesnt mean enjoyment...look at the NBA im sure its heaps tactical but its boring as shit
this. man city have cash moneys, the others don't. in the long run that is all that matters.whats your definition of "soon"?
i could see man city challenging for titles in the next 2-3 if they continue in their current path, but the rest still need something more for it to be a possibility
Thats arguable, we unlike some clubs see the negatives of giving the Lampards/Terry/Tevez's ridiculous amount of money and that in the end it can only hurt football... we have wage structure and balance within the clubcan't offer the salaries the big 4 can.
Those are the only ones worth mentioning... even then Arteta, Fellaini and Modric are nowhere near the calibur of players that Cesc and Rooney are... the others you mentioned are laughablespurs: kranjar, modric, defoe
villa: agbonlahor,
everton: arteta, cahill, fellaini, baines, rodwell, bilyaletdinov.
there's a few that pop into my head.
Spurs have spent a shitload of money and have a massive wage bill... but apart from them you're rightthey certainly can't offer the salaries the big 4 can.
because its not on TV...i used to play for kellyville when i was younger and the a-grade team were in the state league...division 4 or something but i used to go watch them play sometimesquality doesn't only mean enjoyment - it means everything. why do you watch the a-league say... over the NSW premier league?
and an NBA fan could very well say the same thing bout football.
this. man city have cash moneys, the others don't. in the long run that is all that matters.
the teams that do produce half-decent players will increasingly find themself at the mercy of the big 4. they can't offer the 'non-monetary' incentives (UCL, national team exposure, team rosters) the big 4 can and they certainly can't offer the salaries the big 4 can.
What about Milner? Hes having a great season.Those are the only ones worth mentioning... even then Arteta, Fellaini and Modric are nowhere near the calibur of players that Cesc and Rooney are... the others you mentioned are laughable
thats part of what makes him so greatMessi 4-1 Arsenal, CSKA moscow 0-1 Inter
Imagine what would happen to Barcelona if Messi was injured... Wenger summed it up brilliantly, "He is like a Playstation player".