Tbh 2011 wasn't too bad. I'd reckon that 2007 was quite a hard one (maybe). 2008 was probably a bit difficult too.maybe 2011?
Inb4someonesaysthey'reallez
doing those right nowDo the 1995-2000 HSC papers
They have nice questions which are not that simple in comparison to papers from 2001 onwards.
it wasn't that bad :/1997 imo
I shall do them all, I think that will suffice.doing those right now
How's chem coming?1997 imo
Chem studying is going alright, it's actually quite boring going over the same things and doing past papers.I'm screwed LOL I haven't even started revising my option. Should be okay for core though... :/ hopefully...
What about you?
AGREED. yes.
binomial always kills lol. But i think last years one was okay except for that question and one other which I can't remember ahha. Last year's projectile was straightforward though, probably going to wr3ck me this year....
m9 pls it had loan repayments. HPF was screwed.
I'm screwed LOL I haven't even started revising my option. Should be okay for core though... :/ hopefully...
What about you?
AGREED. yes.
binomial always kills lol. But i think last years one was okay except for that question and one other which I can't remember ahha. Last year's projectile was straightforward though, probably going to wr3ck me this year....
m9 pls it had loan repayments. HPF was screwed.
4u exam also had no induction... Rather odd paper.You had no perms and combs or probability in your 4U exam.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a big chunk of Q14
according to my teacher, who set general maths last few years, the committee which sets each math paper has no interaction with the other committees (e.g. the people setting 3u do not communicate at all with the people setting 4u), and this allows the teacher setting one maths exam to teach other levels that year (e.g. my teacher set general maths but still taught 2u, 3u and 4u those years...) - because if a teacher (A) setting 4u had to deal with a teacher setting 3u, teacher A would know what is in the 3u paper and this would prevent him from teaching 3u, even though he is setting only 4u.You had no perms and combs or probability in your 4U exam.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a big chunk of Q14
ftfy4u exam also had no induction... completely mangled paper.
The greatest and the best topic <3. It would definitely be a massive surprise if it was though, combinatorics and probability in MX1 are generally about 4-7 marks I think.You had no perms and combs or probability in your 4U exam.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a big chunk of Q14
If they have perms and combs along with probability in a paper, max 5 marks. The paper is 70 marks total, they "need" to address most (all except one maybe) topics taught in the paper.ftfy
The greatest and the best topic <3. It would definitely be a massive surprise if it was though, combinatorics and probability in MX1 are generally about 4-7 marks I think.
Yeah pretty much.If they have perms and combs along with probability in a paper, max 5 marks. The paper is 70 marks total, they "need" to address most (all except one maybe) topics taught in the paper.
Not sure what you mean but I definitely like it, it's pretty simple, elegant and just plain beautiful =).is this what happens to perms and combs once you do 4u?
confirmed nois this what happens to perms and combs once you do 4u?