View attachment 34041
ahh ok, because the syllabus only mentions a couple only so that's why I'm asking
Some of those are with reference to Section I and Section II questions. For example, questions relating to financial ratios can be asked within those 2 sections. Comparative ratio analysis questions can also be included in Section II. Consider Question 24 (d) from the 2020 Business Studies HSC exam:
"Explain TWO ways in which comparative ratio analysis can be used by this business to assess its financial position."
Similarly, recommending strategies to improve financial performance and examining ethical financial reporting practices can be assessed in one, a combination of, or all of Section I, Section II and Section III. Consider one of the requirements of Question 25 from the 2017 Business Studies HSC exam:
"recommend TWO strategies to improve financial performance"
Additionally, consider one of the requirements of Question 26 from the 2016 Business Studies HSC exam:
"explain possible limitations of the financial reports"
All of what has been mentioned until this point is aimed at analysing hypothetical business case studies. Of course, nothing technically stops these syllabus components from being assessed in Section IV, where they would require support using real-life case study material and/or Section II (although it would be safe to assume that this would be quite rare) questions that require a response with reference to a business that you have studied.
In summary, being knowledgeable in the 4 areas that you have outlined in the syllabus in terms of case study material is definitely recommended. Having further case study knowledge that extends beyond those 4 areas with respect to the Finance topic (if possible) is also encouraged.