Search results

Needs mass neg rep. Use the SAM calculator, that'll give you a pretty accurate idea of what you'd need

binding precedent = MUST give same sentence Persuasive means legally not binding, but the court might take it into account when judging; e.g. supreme court of nsw looks at a decision previously made by supreme court of victoria, not legally binding but they might wanna follow what they ended up...

@op: 97.5

high 80s

bright students are most probably only betrayed if they live outside sydney or for some other reason can't go to a selective school that would benefit them, e.g. parents not making em do test or something. if you have reasonable teachers though, and/or you work well independently, I don't see...

Whatever dude, I'm not going to be convinced, you can think what you want. What I am more certain about is the superiority of Usyd's arts facilities, arts also interest me. But whatever. This is meant to be about eco at unsw, not arts/law at usyd

I'd pay that, but outside top 100 could be lower than mid 90s, if it's say outside top 250

I am a 2009er because I was born in November 1991. My mother is a lawyer. She employs graduates, and she says Sydney > all, basically. Also, a person doing alright in sydney or nsw would tend to beat the best in the lower tier universities

mid 80s, maybe 90

Heard it before? I have. Absolution; Thoughts of a Dying Atheist. Only heard bits and pieces, but from what I've heard it'll grow on me but it won't be as good as the old ones

Re: What UAI/ATAR&Course are you aiming for? sig. But perhaps usyd law in my dreams.

@lych: 95+, because it's uncertain how well you'll do in maths with a school rank like that

Too high; 70s

NFI, my last exam is on my birthday...Might go out and get pissed or something Other than that: get Ls get job relax perhaps try writing music

I reckon you should choose subjects more based on how well you're doing than by scaling... Your current subjects scale well with the exception of ancient, and none scale horrible. Senior Science does not scale well, yes, but doing well in that would be better than being near bottom in chem

Always thought Stones overrated, not that I've really heard enough to really say properly

Lol, nothing I've heard would say that mate.

Hypothetical, o.O it'd be damn cool though

On the contrary, it is actually really important. If you had 1000 people in your grade but you had those ranks, you could still get 99+ with a school rank of 600. School rank is determined by the percentage of band 6s (not the amount), so, yeah, it's undeniably relevant. but in this case it's...

Feasible if you nail the exams