Search results

Boo hoo. I'm so useless. I only got 94. Or 95. Or 96. Get a life. That means you aced the exam. Quite the bitching. The people who do beter seem to be complaining more than the people I know who bombed out. Grow up. Me? I got 88.35. Should get me into Communications at Newcastle (Kisses 4...

Biggest load of wank ever. If you can bullshit convincingly you come first. Worked for me.

I actually liked the first question, had heaps of good quotes I could use, plus showed how the questioned etc etc statement a the end could be applied to my 5 historians, The case stusy was okay, I did the Crusades so that was pretty easy to do.

The highest for our trials was 87, I got second on 81. Our teacher is a very hard marker - The top students all are ones who regulary get 90+ in every other subject.

I did mine on Ned Kelly - it was pretty sweet, looked at how different historians have portrayed him, through The True History of the Kelly Gang, Nolan's paintings, websites, newspapers of the day and that sort of stuff. I found it intersting and i got 38/40 for it.

OUt of 25 about 8 left, I stated until the end, had plenty to write.

Ahh, it is amusing to see people who have no grammitical skills claiming to be smaryt "and all the teachers hated me". I got average marks because I'm lazy. I didn't put enough work in, and at least i can admit that. Grow up.

Yep. Me too. Took me 1 page of working, and it seemed right...

Think I went well. Filled up all space provided in WW1, wrote 8 pages for China (did communist party influence on peasents) 4 on each for Sun Yixian and a big 11.5 pages for Indochina.

Thought it was good. Did the US policies one. Got stuck into the US good. Talked about how the policies affected both Vietnam and Cambodia.

Went well in that question (I hope) Talked about Huxley commenting on communism "Everybody belongs to everyone", Production line manufacturing, through bokanovsky's, cosumerism, ending is better than mending that sort of stuff. For Blade Runner talked about pollution concerns, esp. Acid rain...

Question 1 was excellent. Very happy with it. Question 2 was a load of bull. Who the hell rights a conversation? Question 3 WTF? Nothing like what we had studied for his&mem. I was screwed. We were basically assured that it would be an essay on the relationship between history and memory...

Person 1 and person 2. Shortened to P1 and P2. Sounded like I was talking about to mixed up bannanas. Person 2 kept on getting stuck into post-modernism, bless his little cotton socks.

Hated it. Nothing like what I studied for. Most of my info and related material was on the "complex interrelationship between history and memory." Buut I think I did okay. I finished it, and I showed that I had at least rid the 50th gate, so here's hoping.