i agree. the paper isnt as hard as people are making it out to be. but i agree the simpsons rule question(in Q28) was a bitch. and compared to past papers it is hard. but for most of it was good.
how did everyone find it?
i did brecht and cont. aust. theatre.
was sooo good. =] i was dreading it. but they were excactly the type of Q's i was hopeing for. =]
my room is disgustingly messy. i had made attempts between some exams and somehow became messier than before. notes are everywhere. although i must say its still organized. =]. i have a burn bag, ironically its in a green enviro bag. and thats overflowing. with just english maths and history...
i have a few plans, mainly one big one and lots of back up plans if they previous dont succeed.
study visual communication at UTS, billy blue. or shillington college (any of them) or study design in a college in england.
& move overseas France, Switzerland or stay in england.
and my dream job...
my teachers recommended to refer to two in great detail, and just briefly on the rest. no they dont ask for one story its what ever stories you can back your answer up best with. if you look at past papers, that should give you an idea, 2007 hsc says: reference prescribed text and atleast one...
thankyouuu.
uhm with tthe attempts at peacemaking it says in my text book that it falls under the defeat of south vietnamese forces. i suppose with the North re-unifying vietnam and whatnot. andd nature and significance of anti-war movements in the USA.
also with reasons for communist...
when studying texts like SeaChange, how much detail should we know? or that you would reccomend. coz i have a ridiculous amounts of notes for ep1, lack of notes for ep2.
just wondering if i could get away with cutting down notes on ep1?