Search results

yeah, i'm panicking but the shortlisted letter from eco + business says offers will be posted after uai results so maybe there'll be a nice surprise for us in the letterbox come monday :)

missed out on first preference by 0.25 :(

can't seem to find much info on this.... 2005 was 93.2 UAI cut-offs for 2005 - Future undergraduate - The University of Sydney

i heard we learn how to spell at schoolies. no but seriously. just be good to relax and be with friends for a while; i take it you're not going...?

anybody going?

agreed. it will be interesting to see which one the bos accepts . . does anyone know if there has been a question like this before? with two possible answers?

wow, hi ! more very happy than surprised i guess, means i have a chance to get high band six =]]

assuming 2008 paper was comparable to the 2006 paper, i thought this quote was interesting... does it surprise anyone else? comes from someone who did extension one in 2006 [called Trebla]. http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=157230&page=3 "When I did the Extension 1 paper...

based on the general consensus on bos about the relative difficulty of the exam, yes. but who knows really? all just speculation.

haha, yeah. <3 scaling!

yeah, that's why 67-71 scaled to 94? killah dude. http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=164144

runnable, your argument is valid but since the answers referred to inflation AND unemployment, i believe the question was testing knowledge of the long run phillips curve.

7 is C read 360 -361 of dixon. clearly states it.

misquote. it says will not lead to PERMANENT reductions =)

dixon says: developed economies experience low income levels, high levels of inequality and generally have agriculture based economies...

so does the textbook example... =S

for 7 from dixon textbook: long run phillips curve...economy starts at point A, with an unemployment rate of 5% and 0% inflation. if the government operates expansionary macroeconomic policy...the economy will move to point B, with a lower rate of unemployment, 3% but higher rate of inflation 2%.