• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

circle geo question (1 Viewer)

polythenepam

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
57
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hey i need help with a circle geo question

PQ and RS are common tangents to two intersecting circles. IF T is one of the points of intersection of the two circles, prove that the circles through T,P,W and through T,R,S touch eachother

can anyone help ??
 

polythenepam

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
57
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
ohh thats a typo sorry i meant T,P,Q

so the question is
PQ and RS are common tangents to two intersecting circles. IF T is one of the points of intersection of the two circles, prove that the circles through T,P,Q and through T,R,S touch eachother

this is from fitz by the way Q8
 

who_loves_maths

I wanna be a nebula too!!
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
600
Location
somewhere amidst the nebulaic cloud of your heart
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
hi polythenepam,

PQ and RS are common tangents to two intersecting circles. IF T is one of the points of intersection of the two circles, prove that the circles through T,P,Q and through T,R,S touch eachother
since both circles TPQ and TRS pass through T, then if they ONLY touch eachother, it would have to be at T. in other words, both circles TPQ and TRS share a common tangent through T.

since T can be either intersection points of the original two circles, then for clarity and unambiguity in my proof below, i will need to fix it to one point. so, let T be the intersection point that is, say, on the side closest to the common tangent RS.
now, draw a tangent at T to the new circle TRS. Produce (extend) this tangent so that it cuts the original circle with P on it at X, and cuts the original circle with Q on it at Y. (ie. the original circles are now PTX and QTY)

okay...now for the notation and variables:
let "<" denote "angle"; let < TPQ= x , < TQP= y, and < RTS= z

now for the proof:

< PQT = y = < QYT (alt. < in opposite segment theorem, tangent being PQ)

< TRS = < STY (alt. < in opposite segment theorem, tangent being XY)
but, < STY = < YSS' , where S' is any point on RS away from S in the direction R-> S, (alt. < in opposite segment theorem, tangent being RS)
therefore, < TRS = < YSS' ---> TR//YS
hence, < RTS = z = < TSY (alt < 's on //lines)
and so, < TQY = 180 - < TSY = 180 - z (opposite < 's in cyclic quad. TQYS are supplementary)

< QTY = 180 - < TQY - < QYT (< sum of triangle TQY) = 180 - (180-z) -y = z - y
and in similar fashion as above, you get: < PTX = z - x

now, < PTQ = 180 - < QPT - < PQT = 180 -x -y
and, < PTQ + < PTX + < QTY = 180 (< sum of straight line).
ie. 180 = (180 -x -y) + (z -x) + (z-y) ---> z = x + y

therefore, < PTX = z - x = y , and < QTY = z - y = x ;
hence, < PTX = y = < PQT, and < QTY = x = < QPT
----->(through the alt. < in opposite segment theorem) XY MUST be tangent at T to circle TPQ.

hence, circles TRS and TPQ share a common tangent XY at T, which means they touch at T.

hope that helps :)
 
Last edited:

polythenepam

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
57
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
okay wow
thanx heaps for u answer n yeeh it definitely helped.. jst hope i didnt waste ur time
 

polythenepam

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
57
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
yeeh it does tho alot of ppl say its crap probably cos it doesnt do complex that well, but the other chapters hav some hard questions.. tho cambridge n patel probably hav more of the harder ones
 

FinalFantasy

Active Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
1,179
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
polythenepam said:
yeeh it does tho alot of ppl say its crap probably cos it doesnt do complex that well, but the other chapters hav some hard questions.. tho cambridge n patel probably hav more of the harder ones
ppl think cambridge 4u is full of harder questions, but i disagree..
i reckon patel would provide more harder q's
 

FinalFantasy

Active Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
1,179
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
who_loves_maths said:
cambridge 3u is harder than cambridge 4u actually.
yep! and the hard cambridge 3u makes ppl think cambridge 4u is hard as well
 

polythenepam

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
57
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hmm yeeh i guess soo.. thats same with fitz..
n yeh patel does hav the harder ones.. its just the book gets so awkward sometimes.. patel seems like a bit of a weirdo lol no offence to him
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top