J
jhakka
Guest
Good evening to everyone who happens to be really, really, ridiculously good looking,
You've reached the end of the road, the journey is almost over, and every other bad cliche that comes to mind. I'm pretty sure the final submission date is coming up soon, and at the very least I know that it hasn't passed, because there would be many a student wanting everyone else to read their works. And so, before it's too late, I will attempt to provide you guys with a rough, semi-coherent and even slightly correct summary/guide/crash course to the Reflection Statement. I am least comfortable with this guide, mainly because you don't actually get any feedback from the markers, so it is most important for you to remember that, without a doubt, your teacher knows better than I do on this one.
I won't say that this piece is particularly pleasant or easy to write, and everyone's style will differ. To be honest, I struggled like hell to write mine, and it wasn't a nice experience. The Major Work itself was so much more fun.
What is this...? A CENTRE FOR ANTS?! (About this component):
I would assume that when you get to this point that you have completed your Major Works and just need to write this nasty little thing before signing your life away and submitting your final product. As this is the case, I wish you all the best because I found this piece extremely difficult to get a handle on at the beginning, and even then it took at least two rewrites to get something even slightly respectable.
Anyways, this component is your final reflection (this goes without saying, considering it has the word in the name) about the development of your Major Work, your processes, research and so on. I saw it as a justification of the main aspects of my work, my reasoning for any huge choices I made and and a bit of an explanation about my research, and how all this came together to address the much talked about five dot points found on page 131 of the English Syllabus.
So what's all the big fuss? The fact that you only have 1500 words to do it in, and that it's weighted at (so rumour has it, don't quote me on this) about 15 to 20% (out of 50%) of your external mark. So it's almost as important as your Major Work, and will probably be a major factor in getting the marker to look favourably upon you.
They'll be looking for us at Maury's right? But they won't be looking for... not us. (What to do):
Sometimes this component seems like fun, and other times it doesn't. It's kind of like a combination of your assessments and journal, but not really like that, only because it's meant to accompany and compliment your work, rather than be seen as a completely separate piece that coldly explains specific details. This one is slightly more personal, allowing you to focus on the most important parts of your work and your process, while focussing on the five syllabus points that are as follows (and can also be found on page 131 of the English Stage 6 Syllabus).
I won't go into the ins and outs of each point, only because that would be my interpretation and would most likely be incorrect. Most of the stuff seems quite straightforward to me anyway, and probably would be to most of you guys. If anything seems a bit iffy, I would reccomend asking your teacher or going on your gut instinct. If you're pretty sure that one of the points refers to a specific part of your process, you're probably correct.
Anyways, rather than going into how to address each point (a bad idea, I think, because each work and medium is completely different, and different approaches will apply), I will try to give you a bit of help in how to prepare your information in case you have trouble writing this thing from scratch like I did.
What I found to be most effective in developing my Reflection Statement was using each of these criteria points and making them into a subheading, and then attempting to get 200 or 300 words written for each in what could be paragraphs in five completely different essays. I then lobbed a nice introduction and conclusion (with an appropriate amount of sucking up, talking about valuable insights gained from this course, and so on) before and after these sections, and tried to link them all together neatly.
The hardest part of writing the Reflection Statement was making everything fit and flow. If you don't want to use what you wrote word for word, I would print it off and then try and write it from a blank document, using the information you have created for yourself. However you go about writing your Reflection Statement, make sure it flows.
If you don't want to dedicate it to only talking about the five dot points, I don't see that it is a problem. As long as what you do talk about compliments your Major Work and supports, in some way (small or large, direct or indirect), the criteria points, I'm sure that all will be good.And another thing that you have to do, although I think it's silly and have no idea why it's required/encouraged (it's not in the syllabus under the Reflection Statement anyway!) is try and link your Major Work to your studies in English Advanced and English Extension 1. I truly think this is stupid, as each course is separate to the others, with Extension 2 being particularly separated, however apparently it's what the markers want. I don't think that the link has to be massive, and certainly shouldn't have to link to particular texts you examined. An example (as poor as it may be) would be mentioning how understanding of how genre works and how conventions are applied or otherwise, has allowed you to apply similar strategies in your short story in order to get the best effect. Not the best example, but an example nonetheless.
Without going into any great (and possibly incorrect) detail, the two things I must stress to you guys are that you make sure you address the criteria points, and make sure it flows. There is nothing worse than a (boring) Reflection Statement that looks as though it is actually five essays put together, with no idea of structure and logic to it. But you're all clever enough to know how to write a logical, well structured response, so no worries, right?
There's more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. (Layout and format):
Format is a bit of a tricky issue, if only because there is nothing specified in the syllabus. But what I found worked was to do it in essay format and work around to talking about each of the dot points. 1500 words is a lot to work with, although depending on how much you actually have to say (without making it up), it might not sound like enough.
The reason I reccomend that you work in an essay format is because it allows for a set structure, allowing you to address all of your key points in a logical manner that will allow the marker to identify what fulfills what criteria. That's not to say that you have to address the dot points in order, but at least they'll be able to work out what matches up with what.
I don't know how much that will help you, but if you're still not sure about format, I would look into the standards packages if they're available for English Extension 2, and definitely have a glance at how Reflection Statements in the Showcase are set out. They might be boring, but at least they'll give you some idea of what the markers may like.
And I think that's it. My apologies for not being more detailed, but it's been two years since I had to do this, and I am still kinda lost when it comes to the Reflection Statement. This may be due to the fact that the syllabus is not very specific, or maybe because of a lack of personal feedback. Either way, I hope that what I have been able to come up with has been helpful to you.
I must say, though, that because this is a massive part of your mark I strongly reccomend that you run anything based on my advice by your teacher BEFORE YOU SUBMIT IT. Your teacher will always know better than I do.
It's over-ish guys! Well done!
Good luck, and remember that even the best of us can die in a freak gasoline fight accident.
Justin
Note: You can find more info and opinions on the Reflection Statement here: http://community.boredofstudies.org...2/51541/documenting-reflection-statement.html
Just a bit of a disclaimer:
The things that Lynn and I post will not be the same. One of us may miss out on something that the other will mention. Sometimes we will have conflicting comments. The most important thing to remember is that what we are writing is a general guide, and that we are not more knowledgeable than your teachers. If there are issues, please take it up with them. We are not responsible for your work, and if you choose to take our advice, I strongly urge you to run it by your teacher first.
You've reached the end of the road, the journey is almost over, and every other bad cliche that comes to mind. I'm pretty sure the final submission date is coming up soon, and at the very least I know that it hasn't passed, because there would be many a student wanting everyone else to read their works. And so, before it's too late, I will attempt to provide you guys with a rough, semi-coherent and even slightly correct summary/guide/crash course to the Reflection Statement. I am least comfortable with this guide, mainly because you don't actually get any feedback from the markers, so it is most important for you to remember that, without a doubt, your teacher knows better than I do on this one.
I won't say that this piece is particularly pleasant or easy to write, and everyone's style will differ. To be honest, I struggled like hell to write mine, and it wasn't a nice experience. The Major Work itself was so much more fun.
What is this...? A CENTRE FOR ANTS?! (About this component):
I would assume that when you get to this point that you have completed your Major Works and just need to write this nasty little thing before signing your life away and submitting your final product. As this is the case, I wish you all the best because I found this piece extremely difficult to get a handle on at the beginning, and even then it took at least two rewrites to get something even slightly respectable.
Anyways, this component is your final reflection (this goes without saying, considering it has the word in the name) about the development of your Major Work, your processes, research and so on. I saw it as a justification of the main aspects of my work, my reasoning for any huge choices I made and and a bit of an explanation about my research, and how all this came together to address the much talked about five dot points found on page 131 of the English Syllabus.
So what's all the big fuss? The fact that you only have 1500 words to do it in, and that it's weighted at (so rumour has it, don't quote me on this) about 15 to 20% (out of 50%) of your external mark. So it's almost as important as your Major Work, and will probably be a major factor in getting the marker to look favourably upon you.
They'll be looking for us at Maury's right? But they won't be looking for... not us. (What to do):
Sometimes this component seems like fun, and other times it doesn't. It's kind of like a combination of your assessments and journal, but not really like that, only because it's meant to accompany and compliment your work, rather than be seen as a completely separate piece that coldly explains specific details. This one is slightly more personal, allowing you to focus on the most important parts of your work and your process, while focussing on the five syllabus points that are as follows (and can also be found on page 131 of the English Stage 6 Syllabus).
- summarises the intent of the work and the relationship it has with the extensive independent investigation
- must include an outline of the intended audience for the Major Work and the purpose for which it was composed
- supports the Major Work explaining the relationships of concept, structure, technical and language features and conventions
- should explain the development of concepts during the process of composition making the links clear between independent investigation and the development of the finished product
- should indicate how the student realised the concepts in the final product.
I won't go into the ins and outs of each point, only because that would be my interpretation and would most likely be incorrect. Most of the stuff seems quite straightforward to me anyway, and probably would be to most of you guys. If anything seems a bit iffy, I would reccomend asking your teacher or going on your gut instinct. If you're pretty sure that one of the points refers to a specific part of your process, you're probably correct.
Anyways, rather than going into how to address each point (a bad idea, I think, because each work and medium is completely different, and different approaches will apply), I will try to give you a bit of help in how to prepare your information in case you have trouble writing this thing from scratch like I did.
What I found to be most effective in developing my Reflection Statement was using each of these criteria points and making them into a subheading, and then attempting to get 200 or 300 words written for each in what could be paragraphs in five completely different essays. I then lobbed a nice introduction and conclusion (with an appropriate amount of sucking up, talking about valuable insights gained from this course, and so on) before and after these sections, and tried to link them all together neatly.
The hardest part of writing the Reflection Statement was making everything fit and flow. If you don't want to use what you wrote word for word, I would print it off and then try and write it from a blank document, using the information you have created for yourself. However you go about writing your Reflection Statement, make sure it flows.
If you don't want to dedicate it to only talking about the five dot points, I don't see that it is a problem. As long as what you do talk about compliments your Major Work and supports, in some way (small or large, direct or indirect), the criteria points, I'm sure that all will be good.And another thing that you have to do, although I think it's silly and have no idea why it's required/encouraged (it's not in the syllabus under the Reflection Statement anyway!) is try and link your Major Work to your studies in English Advanced and English Extension 1. I truly think this is stupid, as each course is separate to the others, with Extension 2 being particularly separated, however apparently it's what the markers want. I don't think that the link has to be massive, and certainly shouldn't have to link to particular texts you examined. An example (as poor as it may be) would be mentioning how understanding of how genre works and how conventions are applied or otherwise, has allowed you to apply similar strategies in your short story in order to get the best effect. Not the best example, but an example nonetheless.
Without going into any great (and possibly incorrect) detail, the two things I must stress to you guys are that you make sure you address the criteria points, and make sure it flows. There is nothing worse than a (boring) Reflection Statement that looks as though it is actually five essays put together, with no idea of structure and logic to it. But you're all clever enough to know how to write a logical, well structured response, so no worries, right?
There's more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. (Layout and format):
Format is a bit of a tricky issue, if only because there is nothing specified in the syllabus. But what I found worked was to do it in essay format and work around to talking about each of the dot points. 1500 words is a lot to work with, although depending on how much you actually have to say (without making it up), it might not sound like enough.
The reason I reccomend that you work in an essay format is because it allows for a set structure, allowing you to address all of your key points in a logical manner that will allow the marker to identify what fulfills what criteria. That's not to say that you have to address the dot points in order, but at least they'll be able to work out what matches up with what.
I don't know how much that will help you, but if you're still not sure about format, I would look into the standards packages if they're available for English Extension 2, and definitely have a glance at how Reflection Statements in the Showcase are set out. They might be boring, but at least they'll give you some idea of what the markers may like.
And I think that's it. My apologies for not being more detailed, but it's been two years since I had to do this, and I am still kinda lost when it comes to the Reflection Statement. This may be due to the fact that the syllabus is not very specific, or maybe because of a lack of personal feedback. Either way, I hope that what I have been able to come up with has been helpful to you.
I must say, though, that because this is a massive part of your mark I strongly reccomend that you run anything based on my advice by your teacher BEFORE YOU SUBMIT IT. Your teacher will always know better than I do.
It's over-ish guys! Well done!
Good luck, and remember that even the best of us can die in a freak gasoline fight accident.
Justin
Note: You can find more info and opinions on the Reflection Statement here: http://community.boredofstudies.org...2/51541/documenting-reflection-statement.html
Just a bit of a disclaimer:
The things that Lynn and I post will not be the same. One of us may miss out on something that the other will mention. Sometimes we will have conflicting comments. The most important thing to remember is that what we are writing is a general guide, and that we are not more knowledgeable than your teachers. If there are issues, please take it up with them. We are not responsible for your work, and if you choose to take our advice, I strongly urge you to run it by your teacher first.
Last edited by a moderator: