can u please verify this in a more simpler explanation please? is this wat u mean:Silver Persian said:I thought if productivity rose but aggregate demand remained constant, unemployment would rise, as less labour can now satisfy consumer demand
But isn't MER structural change?mashi said:1. Explain the effect of an increase in productivity on unemployment.
2. Compare and contrast the concept of structural change and microeconomic reform.
Now, don't refer to your textbooks! =)
All the things that you have stated are areas of MER & re-training of labour isn't part of MER!!! But the GST is!!!!aditya said:and i think the answer for the second one would be:
structural change refers to changes in teh way the eocnomy and the firms within it function, i mean, for e.g. deregulating financial markets is an exmaple of structural change, privatisation of firms is structural change (is it?) wage determiniation systems such as the award or the AWA changes in those are all exampels of structural change... microeconic reform can be a result of structural change - meaning, as a result of structural change, the government will need to apply microeconomic policies to "clean up" the leftovers so to speak, generally involces re-training of labour, or professional help on the new structural change - like when the GST came in, they offered free advice for small businesses....
Yes :uhhuh:jimmik said:can u please verify this in a more simpler explanation please? is this wat u mean:
if u increase productivity ---> increase ouput using same amount of input ---> less labour needed to meet the same aggregate demand ---> unemployment rises