• YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

emf/current (1 Viewer)

zenger69

Bok Choyer
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
673
Location
Hot Sydney's place
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
there was a question we had for a motors and generators topic test. It was fill in the blanks. The change in magnetic flux induces a/an ___________ in the coil.

So I wrote current.

But my teacher said should be an electromagnet force (emf) but aren't they the same thing. If emf is measured in V and Current measured in I.

P=VI therefore if there's voltage there's a current.

therefore they are ultimately the same thing, they are power.

Is that true what i've said or wrong?
 

AntiHyper

Revered Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
1,103
Location
Tichondrius
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
it should be the change in flux over change in time equals emf:
EMF = change in flux/change in time
 

MuffinMan

Juno 15/4/08 :)
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
3,975
Location
Liverpool, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
For a current to flow through a galvanometer, there must be an emf.
So it should be like this shouldnt it

The change in magnetic flux induces a/an emf in the coil which produces a current
by the way emf = electromotive force not electromagnet force
hope this helps :)
ps i just had my physics half yearly today...didnt feel like to talk about physics anymore...
 

Will Hunting

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
214
Location
Carlton
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
zenger69 said:
there was a question we had for a motors and generators topic test. It was fill in the blanks. The change in magnetic flux induces a/an ___________ in the coil.

So I wrote current.

But my teacher said should be an electromagnet force (emf) but aren't they the same thing. If emf is measured in V and Current measured in I.

P=VI therefore if there's voltage there's a current.

therefore they are ultimately the same thing, they are power.

Is that true what i've said or wrong?
Nah, dude.

Moving a magnetic field relative to a conductor, or changing magnetic flux, induces a potential difference across ends of the conductor. This supplies charges, in the conductor, with potential energy, the induced potential difference resulting in work done on the charges and the conversion of (electrical) potential energy into kinetic energy i.e. a current will flow. This is what emf is, man. It's defined as energy supplied/charge and refers to the energy possessed by charges due to a P.D. across a source, in this case, the P.D. induced in the conductor by the change in flux.

Don't confuse emf with current. They are both related but are still distinguishble as entities in their own rights. Power is a dimension derived from the two "separate" dimensions, V and I. Don't mix power up with emf either.
 

Will Hunting

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
214
Location
Carlton
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
In the case of elecromagnetic induction,

You should say: an emf has been induced across ends of the conductor
And you should say: By Lenz' Law, current will flow in the direction such to oppose the change in magnetic flux that caused the induced emf

Note that, qualitatively, emf and current are "equivalent", but not the same thing. You cannot induce an emf without causing current to flow, and, conversely, a current cannot exist without an emf, but they are, technically, different things measured in different units and representing different activities (on the subatomic scale)
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top