is the advantage over competition rlly that large over other unis i.e usyd and uts? ive heard that unsw is at least the strongest? when it comes to engineering and stem but is that rlly a game changer
tbh unless if ur gunning for some really high level job like finance, law, google etc employers (especially in engineering) generally don't care about which uni you went to. not to mention that uts and usyd are also pretty respected unis for engineering by employers, so i really wouldn't make it too much of a consideration. what i would consider more is the environment at each of the unis. from what ive heard, experienced in my classes and from what ppl i know say about engineering (i can speak the most about uts as that's where i go):
usyd:
- classes are more on the "academic" side of engineering as in classes are based on theory more than projects, higher weighting for finals as a result (sometimes up to 65%)
- has a lot of "professional engineering practice" stuff as in you'll be forced to go to volunteer/mentor/network/etc a lot
- a wide range of elective units, usually will allow you to dip your feet into other related disciplines a lot and overall fairly flexible
- better if you want the "academic" experience and want to emphasise the physics/maths/etc behind engineering rather than "making stuff" (though of course you will still be doing that obv)
unsw:
- fairly even mix of projects, labs and "academics", some subjects still have high finals weighting (~60% at most) but usually ~50%
- most flexible out of these 3 unis, usually disciplines will have multiple in-depth specialisations and there is a large variety of classes to choose from as discipline electives + trimesters is just generally more flexible
- supposedly has the best industry "prestige" but this really means that some companies like atlassian and canva pretty much cherry pick unsw grads (but generally considered to have the best industry rep)
- better if you want the most wellrounded (but most intense, for better or for worse) experience, you'll get a fair amount of projects and lab based assessments but also have a fair amount of pure theory knowledge
uts:
- moreso project and labs based than "academic", less emphasis on finals (usually ~30-40%, 50% at most) -> you have to take ~4-5 "studio" subjects which are all about major projects (as well as getting deeper into the theory your project is based on)
- less flexibility in elective classes you take within your discipline, usually there will be a few branches that you can choose to specialise in (eg for electrical there's electrical machines, renewables, embedded systems etc) but compared to unsw/usyd who usually have tens of different elective paths not too many options
- a bit more supportive in terms of finding internships and things like this compared to the other unis (uts runs a few in-house internships so if u can't get one they'll basically give u one for free lol)
- better if you're really into the "making stuff" part of engineering, there is going to be less emphasis on pure theory (for instance in our c programming course the lec was literally doing functions and talking about how it was applicable to embedded systems lol)
in terms of teaching the unis are gonna be similar imo. every uni has those 3-4 courses that everyone says has a bad lecturer and complains about, the majority of courses are gonna be pretty well run and then there will be a few classes you take where the lecturer is really good and engaging. overall i'd just pick on location and what environment u think u will succeed the most in, eg there's no point going to unsw for the "prestige" if u know that trimesters are not gonna allow u to do well, similarly if u don't want to go and do a lot of volunteering and networking then maybe u should consider uts/unsw instead of usyd (although these factors aren't absolute obviously)