KING LEAR
In the trial i got 19/20 for and essay where the question was:
"Every director brings a different interpretation to King Lear" - Examine how TWO directors do this, with specific reference to power and abuse."
This is the checklist i use in general...
*Analyse three key scenes, (Usually good to track one charicter and have scenes from beginning middle and end, with detailed knowledge of one speech from each scene) with specific attention to language features (metaphors, similies) and then look at those scenes, with a "Directors view" and get at least 2 different types of shots to compare that correspond with your language features, *****if a question says "HOW" ****
E.G In Act one, Scene i, Lear uses the metaphor "To shake all cares and buisness from our age, conferring them on younger strenghs", this emphasises that he is ready to give up the throne to his three daughters, he even uses the hyperbolic "Old weak and infirm" to demonstrate how he percieves himself. (LEAR Interpretation one - ) In Peter Brook's - 1971 film adaptation, lear is filmed at a slightly upward angle to portray his dominance. ..
etc, you can also comment on costume music and casting
*Introduce the interpretation that the director(s) has used (Whatever siuts you) , and use the language features and film techniques to back up your argument.
eg, COrdelias aside speech, the rhetorical question "What, shall cordelia speak? Love and Be silent" is omitted from Brook's production to portray her as proud and thus reinforce the idea of an Aristotelian tragedy by showing COrdelias "Hubris" or charicter flaw, in this case in the form of excessive pride. Lear is filmed as dominant and overbeaing by the lack of sound and the huge coat he is wearing that tower over him. This shows Brook is directing an aristotelian tragedy as it shows a sense of great order, epitomised by the ironic "That furture strife may be prevented now", which obvioulst later goes into a state of chaos.
*Dont forget to incorporate the question, for example in this test, the emphasis was on power, so i talked about things like how it can corrupt, and how the loss of it can be devistating, etc. Heaps of people last year went into the HSC with a prepared answer and it did not go down well.
*Dont forget to minimise the amount of retelling the story, only say what is relevant to the scenes, and specifically speeches you are referring to, however, a detailed knowledge of the plot is essential. (It IS a critical study of text)
*Add your own perspective to the text, and have an idea of how you would direct it, the example given above is excellent.