Not going to lie, having done Extension 2 last year, I've never come across the King's property nor have I seen it in writing anywhere (whether in a textbook, exam or in the syllabus)Is King's property assumed knowledge or are they more likely to tell you to derive it before using?
how do we do the last two?The King property has appeared in MX2 and 4u Maths exams (HSCs and Trials) over many years. I don't recall a case where it was needed in an HSC without a suitable introduction, so I certainly would not take it as assumed knowledge... though it is a technique of which all MX2 students should be aware. I also can't recall having seen it mentioned in an HSC context as the "King property". In any case, it is the property that
that is usually introduced with a substitution. It is perhaps best known for questions like
where it allows us to show that
and thus gives the simplification, on adding equations (1) and (2)
It can be applied to solving integrals like
and
For this onehow do we do the last two?
Fair point. If this was an HSC question, it would likely tell you to use before the King property.I think the first one could be in the HSC because it comes from the syllabus. However the second one I really think a little bit of hand-holding is needed to complete the question. Otherwise you will get nowhere.
Ah yes, it then becomes . The rest is textbook workFair point. If this was an HSC question, it would likely tell you to use before the King property.
Actually do you mean . If that is the case then surely it exists and is the general form of the King Property. I reckon a little introduction might help and the rest is just what they were taught.Does this one require a little bit of hand-holding?
By the way, there are variants that I often find more useful.
Two common cases are b=-a and b=0.
One more example for fun:
Now, suppose