MedVision ad

Mathematical Induction (1 Viewer)

henry08

Active Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
1,174
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Can someone please explain to me Mathematical Induction as I'm just getting confused by it. I never really got it the first time and are again having problems with it. I have trouble with the third step, proving true for k + 1 usually. Thanks.
 

friction

Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
494
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
The third step is usually the hardest and you usually have to use the second step in it. I dont know what you want explained. You just have to prove that it works for K + 1 and then as it works for 1 it will work for 2 and it will work for 3 etc.
 

danz90

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,467
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I usually break it up into 4 steps.

Remember, Tn is on the LEFT side of the EQUAL sign.. and Sn is to the right of the equal sign.
This would be how I'd do an induction 'for all positive integers n'

Step 1
Show true for n = 1
Sub in n=1 into both Tn and Sn, they should be equal
Hence true for n = 1

Step 2
Assume true for n = k
Just sub k into both Tn and Sn to find Tk and Sk

Step 3
Show true for n = k + 1
First, sub (k+1) into Sn to find S(k+1)
Then, use this: S(k+1) = Sk + T(k+1)
Sub in T(k+1) into Tn, to find T(k+1)

Then use your results and sub into formula S(k+1) = Sk + T(k+1)
Keep simplifying and manipulating the equation (only the RHS) until u get to the result you wrote for S(k+1)
Then you write: Hence, true for n=k+1

Step 4
Since true for n=1, n=k+1, then true for n=2, n=3 and all positive integers n.
 

thanhrox

New Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
28
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
<table id="post3770907" class="tborder" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td class="alt1" id="td_post_3770907">ok, i get the topic but i always have trouble writing out the conclusion, step 4...

therefore n=k is true.. something or other?

what do you write, generically?
for:
- divisible
- multiple
- inequality
- summation?


cheers.

<!-- / message --> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="alt2">
</td> <td class="alt1" align="right"> <!-- controls --> </td></tr></tbody></table>
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
thanhrox said:
<table id="post3770907" class="tborder" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td class="alt1" id="td_post_3770907">ok, i get the topic but i always have trouble writing out the conclusion, step 4...

therefore n=k is true.. something or other?

what do you write, generically?
for:
- divisible
- multiple
- inequality
- summation?

Divisiblity , step n = k
Tk = 9m where m is any real number
same for multiple

Inequality you basically just replace n's with k's which is also the same for summation.
 

catsta

New Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
25
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
step four is like;;

hence it is true for n=k+1 if it is also true for n=k.

something like that. basically you just have to tie your things together.

oh :apig: i hate induction!
 

davidbarnes

Trainee Mȯderatȯr
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
1,459
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Thanks for the help. I've got a pretty good grasp on this now.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top