re: posted 2003 hsc answers (1 Viewer)

[acmilan]

which parts specifically?

 

[tahneen]

the answers posted in the general section of resources for the 2003 hsc paper are wrong - some are right but most are wrong - just letting everyone know so you dont get as frustrated as i did!

 

[meLoncoLLie]

Have a look at this thread - some people have pointed out the errors in Jeff Geha's solutions.

http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=45145

However I think there were a couple of errors in mojako's corrections, for example Q6(c)(ii) should be 5.5 years instead of 5.6 - I'm not sure though, Maths isn't really my thing.

Could someone please post the correct answers, or tell us about the mistakes you've picked out?

edit: in Q6c) ii), 5.6 is correct - the difference was due to rounding (but both 5.5 and 5.6 are acceptable, right?) So all of mojako's corrections are right