The Top 20 Schools (1 Viewer)

[townie]

1. James Ruse Agricultural High School
2. North Sydney Girls High School
3. Baulkham Hills High School
4. Sydney Girls High School
5. Sydney Grammar School
6. North Sydney Boys High School
7. Sydney Boys High School
8. Pymble Ladies' College
9. Moriah College
10. Barker College
11. Hornsby Girls High School
12. St George Girls High School
13. Hurlstone Agricultural High School
14. Sydney Technical High School
15. Abbotsleigh
16. MLC Burwood
17. Trinity Grammar School
18. Fort Street High School
19. Gosford High School
20. Merewether High School

source: http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Class-act-HSC-results-best-yet/2004/12/17/1102787279592.html

 

[KeypadSDM]

They say each year gets better and better. Isn't that just because the more years the HSC is in, the more past papers, and the more understanding of how the New HSC works the higher marks the candidates get?

It will eventually level out, and the SMH will just be dumbfounded.

 

[withoutaface]

They say each year gets better and better. Isn't that just because the more years the HSC is in, the more past papers, and the more understanding of how the New HSC works the higher marks the candidates get?

It will eventually level out, and the SMH will just be dumbfounded.

Either that or the Board lowers the standard to get a band 6 each year...

 

[townie]

or...shock horror....BAND SEVEN

 

[trumpet geek]

hahahahah North Sydney boys got beaten by the girls again!!!

 

[tanvi]

GO NORTH SYDNEY GIRLS!

Sorry, I'm done

 

[velox]

w00t we made 7th

 

[lucyinthehole]

hah, sydney girls is still 4th? i fully thought we'd be the dumbass year that brings the ranking down. compared to last year we're terrible: no one even topped anything!

 

[Minai]

The Daily Telegraph list is more accurate, as it takes into account the candidature size of each school (merit list mentions as a proportion of HSC students at the school), unlike an aggregate with the SMH.

 

[BillyMak]

My school is just your average public, non-selective and 7/21 people in our physics class got band 6s, that's pretty good hey?

 

[Melkor]

woot, sbhs climbing the slippery slopes to success!

but seriously, if it is just an aggregate mark, we have one of the biggest canditatures (i think ~200) in the state, so i wouldnt get too excited we beat schools with 30 people, and totally failed to have an impact on the traditional powerhouses.

 

[glitterfairy]

The Daily Telegraph list is more accurate, as it takes into account the candidature size of each school (merit list mentions as a proportion of HSC students at the school), unlike an aggregate with the SMH.

Hurrah. Because we're 4th on the Daily Telegraph list. And 11th on this one... BEHIND our ARCH ENEMY... BARKER COLLEGE...

This will not do at all.

*sharpens stakes*

 

[cro_angel]

which is here..
http://www.boredofstudies.org/community/showthread.php?t=52893

 

[wanton-wonton]

w00t we made 7th

What's your name and how'd you go?

 

[boasboy]

is my school getting dumber and dumber? (STHS) .. .

or is it just me ?

im scared now ... ._,"

 

[wanton-wonton]

yeh, STHS is a hole.

 

[mr EaZy]

why is there conflict with daily telegraph

that one has fort street as 23 and
malek fahd islamic school as 9th!

how come?

 

[mr EaZy]

no probs- its been answered

 

[heathrow]

The daily telegraph list is more indicitive of the ability of the students. it takes into account the fact that some schools have 20 students doing the hsc and some have several hundred and recognisess that a school with 20 students where all the students do well is a higher achiever than a school with 100 students where 21 students do well. or something like that.

 

[Kelvy]

Bah! I believe SMH! Grammar came 5th in that whereas in telegraph we came 8th! GO GRAMMAR!!