BenPages15
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
Hey everyone,
I'd like to know your opinion as to what in the syllabus for Hatshepsut is 'worth studying'. I'm mainly referring to the first section of the Hatshepsut syllabus, dealing with background on New Kingdom Egypt, called Historical context. Looking at past papers I have only seen one question pulled from there, about the 'relationship of the king to amun' dot point.
I don't see how they could ask questions relating to Hatshepsut from the other points in that section, especially most involve only overviews of aspects of NKE, so I don't see the point in making notes for or studying any of the points from that first section (apart from the one i mentioned above).
I would like to know everyone else's opinion though. Is it worth using valuable study time this close to the HSC to cover the general, overviewing points of the syllabus? Tell me what you think!
Thanks
I'd like to know your opinion as to what in the syllabus for Hatshepsut is 'worth studying'. I'm mainly referring to the first section of the Hatshepsut syllabus, dealing with background on New Kingdom Egypt, called Historical context. Looking at past papers I have only seen one question pulled from there, about the 'relationship of the king to amun' dot point.
I don't see how they could ask questions relating to Hatshepsut from the other points in that section, especially most involve only overviews of aspects of NKE, so I don't see the point in making notes for or studying any of the points from that first section (apart from the one i mentioned above).
I would like to know everyone else's opinion though. Is it worth using valuable study time this close to the HSC to cover the general, overviewing points of the syllabus? Tell me what you think!
Thanks