no worriesOriginally posted by raspb3rry
Thanks perfectionist
Ooh damn... I hated Cambridge for explanations... they make too many mistakes the morons. Fitzpat is really good & so is this other blue & white one... can't for the life of me remember what it's called.Originally posted by raspb3rry
Oh okiz..so out of cambridge and fitzpatrick for 3u, which one better ^^'? I need one that has good explanations and easy to follow, my maths teacher doesnt explain very well, so need to learn from txtbk examples & the one I'm using at school, isn't very good at all~
--
Thanks perfectionist and peppermint_stix, hehe I'll get cambridge denz ^^
I reckon!! :rofl:Originally posted by peppermint_stix
i really hate coroneos...the set out is soooo bad, the explanations are very long winded...and basically it just puts you off maths. oh and did i mention the set out is really baddd 0_0
yep- and it happens in every other textbook thread.Originally posted by ~*HSC 4 life*~
lol i think every maths textbook has been posted in this thread hahaha
Cambridge is scary :|Originally posted by eeyore
Cambridge is good. It has very thorough explanations, and the questions are graded. ie. starts off with normal questions, then has 'development' and 'extension' i think? or something like that - basically it has questions split into 3 groups starting from easy to hard.
yeah, the explanations look complex sometimes (since they try to use the hardest words and stuff ), but in the end its a very good book for questions, especially good for those students doing the 4u course!Originally posted by overwhelming
Cambridge is scary :|