no your teacher sounds spiteful because the question's so... aggressive lolThanks:]
Do you mean i sound spiteful.. or my teacher?
what the heck!? we have the exact same question word for wordHmm out of the other comparative studys I've done it was alright.
Frankenstein was a book that I didnt like reading but after I finished I realised it was pretty good (I had to read Emma for Extension in Year 11 and I didnt even read it)
Blade Runner was a bit "huh?" and "why is he doing that?" for the first viewing
but I'm starting to get the hang of it.
Thats a wierd first assessment task?
Mine is an essay on:
"Similar issues, explored in different contexts, may reflect changes in values and perspectives."
How is this demonstrated in the comparison of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner.
Not too bad I dont think
Same school maybe???what the heck!? we have the exact same question word for word
LOL I go to an all boys school.Same school maybe???
I can appreciate the film for what it is (I think it's incredibly well done in pretty much all aspects actually) but that doesn't mean I have to like it. I just feel really uncomfortable when watching it because of its dull lighting and sense of claustrophobia (I know all that was intentional but I just don't like the way the movie makes me feel).Are you kidding? Bladerunner is an AMAZING movie. Especially considering it was made in the early 80's. I thought it'd be as dodgy as the first star wars movie.
Bladerunner makes you think. I love that in movies.
"Origami dude" (Gaff) knew that Deckard was a replicant. It's a giveaway with the unicorn origami at the end.i dont really get Blade Runner at all, whats with the origami dude??
And does anyone reckon in Blade Runner you could call Roy Batty a prodigal son???
the modern prometheus is an allusion to the ancient Greek story of Prometheus lol.
So you're questioning the benignity of the 'monster' but you say the 'replicants' in BR are sinister.I personally thought, what is the definition of evil. Who was hte true monster Frankenstein or the creature?
something sinister like the “replicants” in Blade Runner.
is destructive a better word?So you're questioning the benignity of the 'monster' but you say the 'replicants' in BR are sinister.
What?
Yeah I agree, but i was questioning its role in the text Frankenstein as a theme.The Modern Prometheus (was punished for pushing beyond permitted boundaries, similar to Frankenstein.
Looking back at the notes ive got here, it states, "the subtitle can also be read as an oxymoron, with the emphasis place on the word 'modern' given added dystopic meanace especially when it is seen comparatively with contemporary texts such as Bladerunner. Mary Shelley's story shows how cruel mankind can be when conscience is abandond. She uses allergories of creation to raise reader awreness of our moral accountability when we tamper with nature. On several levels, the monsters very existence is a condemnation of science, The classical Prometheus served humankind but Victor detaches himself from any moral obligation or responsibility of his experiement..."Yeah I agree, but i was questioning its role in the text Frankenstein as a theme.
Top notes have written a study guide. Though my english teacher believes it's missing crucial points.Sounds like this was a popular choice for Module A, and it doesn't sound too hard either. Does anyone know if any study guides have been written for Frankenstein or Blade Runner since the new syllabus was intro'd? I know "Romulus" has a few already, but that is a bit more prominent as its the AoS. Any help/suggestions appreciated...
Fair enough then, I agree since you have substantiated that point. By the way, where did you get these notes?Looking back at the notes ive got here, it states, "the subtitle can also be read as an oxymoron, with the emphasis place on the word 'modern' given added dystopic meanace especially when it is seen comparatively with contemporary texts such as Bladerunner. Mary Shelley's story shows how cruel mankind can be when conscience is abandond. She uses allergories of creation to raise reader awreness of our moral accountability when we tamper with nature. On several levels, the monsters very existence is a condemnation of science, The classical Prometheus served humankind but Victor detaches himself from any moral obligation or responsibility of his experiement..."