loquasagacious
NCAP Mooderator
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 3,636
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2004
There was a brief article in the herald yesterday which touched on the idea of Australia and New Zealand merging. Of course it's not really a new idea, it was openly discussed before Federation and came so close to being that the constitution makes provisions for it.
Some may recall the story cropping up in 2006:
Personally I'm in favour of a merger because it just seems the sensible thing to do and we're more than halfway there already.
I do wonder though if Australians tend to be more in favour of this than New Zealanders because we would inevitably end up the dominant partner in the merger?
Some may recall the story cropping up in 2006:
Obviously it's not an issue without complexities but on the other hand how complex would it really be? We are already culturally very similar and basically operate as a free trade zone including free movement of labour. Would it be worth the expense and the hassle?smh said:Australia and New Zealand should consider becoming one country, a bi-partisan Government committee has recommended.
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs considered the possibility of harmonising Australia and New Zealand's legal systems.
It found the two countries had a uniquely close relationship stemming from New Zealand being one of seven colonies of Australasia prior to federation in 1901.
"While Australia and New Zealand are of course two sovereign nations, it seems to the committee that the strong ties between the two countries - the economic, cultural, migration, defence, governmental and people-to-people linkages - suggest that an even closer relationship, including the possibility of union, is both desirable and realistic," it found.
Personally I'm in favour of a merger because it just seems the sensible thing to do and we're more than halfway there already.
I do wonder though if Australians tend to be more in favour of this than New Zealanders because we would inevitably end up the dominant partner in the merger?