I have an '88 Ford EA Falcon S-pack. It's a great car and has and has not had any problems. It looks great, drives like new and has (believe it or not) enough power to challenge quite a few modern cars.
It hits 100kp/h in 6.7 seconds. Stock (P's). Straight six MPI. That is fast in TODAYS standards. And it's 21 years old, on it's original engine.
I can see why they are looked down upon though lol. Hard to find any that haven't had the guts thrashed out of them or damage.
I wouldn't have had the money for a more modern car, and nor will I in the next 5 years (I don't believe in putting myself into debt).
Oh, and I've done Murwillumbah to Southport and back on $10 and Murwillumbah to Brisbane for the day and back on $30. Tell me that's not good fuel consumption for a 21 year old Falcon!
You just need to know how to LOOK AFTER your bloody car. The old Commies and Falcons were built to last (be thrashed) and are to an extent indestructable. That is why you see so many in crap shape.
david spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadeBullshit
try 7.7 cunt and thats pushing it. i doubt it would still do close to that seeing as it is original and 20years old
Dude. It was a typo. I didn't realize haha. And I swear it still does. That is the advantage of it only having 200k on the clock. Not driven often, but driven hard when it was.Bullshit
try 7.7 cunt and thats pushing it. i doubt it would still do close to that seeing as it is original and 20years old
dyou do realise the irony in an asian with his account named physicslover calling someone else a geek right?
Three in-line six cylinder engines were initially available; a 3.2 litre single-point injected (aka throttle body injected) engine, a 3.9 litre single-point, and the 3.9 litre multipoint (MPI). The 3.2 was dropped later in 1988 because in addition to the top dog 3.9 multipoint delivering over 50% more power, it actually used no more fuel in the process! When it was available, the 3.2 was only available on the Falcon GL, while at the other end of the spectrum, the multipoint engine was the only option for Fairmont Ghia buyers. Falcon S and Fairmont came with the single-point 3.9, with multipoint fuel injection optional. The two available transmissions were a 5 speed manual and 3 speed auto largely carried over from the previous model. While there had been speculation about a 4 speed automatic being standard before the car's launch, an industrial dispute at supplier BT-R (formerly Borg-Warner) meant the 4 speed was not available for the EA's launch. There had also been some speculation about independent rear suspension.There is no way in hell that car still does 7.7 to 100, and I'd be willing to bet that that claim is bullshit and it never did that.
Lol, just checked, 8.5 stock with the manual. And yes, that is the Multi-Point version.
I reckon as it is now it'd be 9.5 to 10 at best.
I didn't know a 3.2 six could be so slow. Even for the 80's. Though it might be to do with gearing?Its improved suspension, aerodynamics and power enabled the same car to achieve a 215 km/h top speed. With its speedo only running up to 200, it was well and truly off the clock!
Do you know this for a fact?lol it wont do it
Not too sure lol.Graney said:I didn't know a 3.2 six could be so slow. Even for the 80's. Though it might be to do with gearing?
What does a modern, base model commodore or falcon pull for top speed?