dieburndie
Eat, Sleep, Repeat
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2006
- Messages
- 971
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
Teclis, any reason you ignored my last reply on inherent morality/immorality in humans?
In my eyes, you are equal with those that believe in astrology, Zeus and a living Elvis. There is no way to argue with your type; and hence you must be treated akin to a dog; told no! bad dog! no!You know, telling people that they're confused isn't an argument... that's just called being either a) a intellectual moron... b) a dickhead... c) a troll (wait... are you a troll??? Because If so I'm quite happy to accept being Rickrolled and defeat here)
The Bible was an early attempt at explaining the world around us. It is a failed attempt. It is to be discarded to Mythos; with the likes of Baal, Athena and every other God.Why am I confused. Enlighten me O great one to the TRUE meaning of the Bible.
No. Bad!No... Grace is beautiful.
You say you don't know the mind of god. But righht here you explicity claim that you know that nature of God, How on earth do you support these bizarre claims about God being '3 separate but not separate parts'. I didn't ask Jesus to die for me, If I was present at the time I would have done all I could to stop the torture of an innocent person, By what right does he 'die' for my sins? Nauseating stuff.I think It's actually pretty easy to understand. God exists in three parts, wholly the same, yet seperate. Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
Yes Jesus died... to deny his existence or his death on a cross is intellectual folly. And like I said in an earlier post... It was horrible and I am so immensely grateful for the fact that he chose to suffer that instead of me. That by Grace alone I am able to be saved. I am sure that the people in war who were saved by commrades who died to save them... such as men jumping on grenades... or anyone else who was saved by someone elses sacrifice for that matter... would find the fact that you find someone choosing to be sacrificed in the place of many disgusting... disgusting.
You have constantly claimed to be privy to facts about a God which you could not possibly know; i.e What books he wrote, that he is '3 parts', that Jesus was his son (or him?). Furthermore by you being a Christian implies that you Know that your God is the correct one (Islam? Judaism? Hinduism? ad infinitum)....Time, date, place... where did I claim that. Point it out to me. I'll take it back right now. I've never claim to know the mind of God... I only know what the Bible says... not holding a theology degree I'm not always right about the historical/cultural context as well as not being able to read New Testament Greek and a slight lack of compatability between English and Greek... I have been on occasion, wrong. I just believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God. And that you can learn about the best way to live and how to be saved through it.
'Historical facts' do not include the delusions of the indoctrinated and their pathetic fabrications. You do relize when the New Testament was written and by who and for what purpose...it was of course doctored to and 'stack up'....you ignorance is astounding....stop reading books written by Christians for Christians to Confirm Christians.My evidence, as I have stated again and again... We know Historical facts about Jesus. These match up with what is in the New Testament. As a set of accounts of Jesus life and ministry the 4 Gospels stack up like a truthful account that has not been doctored.
Einstein definitely wasn't a Christian...............................................................:mad1:
I'm talking about taking a passage out of context from within the Bible. Albert Einstein said "God does not play dice", therefore he believes in God... are you smarter than Albert Einstein? See what I did there... I took Einstein out of context and misrepresented what he believes... If you understand that he's talking about popular ideas on quantam physics, you wouldn't use the quote in that way.
You agree to let them go to hell? Some friend...You know I'm able to be friends with most of the Atheists around me... they are tolerant of my beliefs in the true sense of the word... we agree to disagree...
Its quite sad that your defending the bible. A baby can point out how absurd it is. No! Bad Dog! No!I'd love to take you through what you believe are the Bible's contradictions... but I'm afraid you'd just throw the answers back without looking and say "babble".
This however is not even remotely a contradiction.
You will indoctrinate your Children....great what a surprise....Of course I'm not going to talk to anyone who doesn't want to listen. But sorry, If your or my Children ask me a question I'm going to answer it. Granted I'll show them my evidence as well...
And what does this say about the probability of your specific believes being true? Pathetic.....This is the most stupid thing you've said so far. Australia is multicultural. I could have just as easily been born to Atheistic, Hindu, Muslim or Christian families. I think about 40% of Australians say they are "Christian" and maybe 5 - 10% are bible believing evangelical Christians, the rest being Christmas, Easter, Wedding, Funeral and christening Christians... or some degree thereof
I can guarantee you my understanding of religion, philosophy, epistemology, ontology and science is far more sophisticated than your own. You read the Origins of Species? clap clap well you obviously didn't assimilate a word.Yes because in many cases, Children of Christian parents go "why on earth am I doing this? This is all i know, how do I know it is right?" And a lot of us go searching. Some choose to reject their faith, others like me choose to embrace it as their own. Granted a lot of them look at rather pathetic evidence that is biased one way or the other. I started with the origin of species, Nietzsche and the Bible... and went from there. What have you read on the topic?
There is no concrete proof for against Zeus, against Baal, against invisible teapots. Well done, way to repeat the most boring and pathetic of straw man arguments against Atheism. Embarrassing really.There is no concrete proof (such as 1 + 1 = 2) for the existence of God. But neither is there concrete proof against. One can look at the Universe and existence and the holes in science and philosophy and our understanding of said universe and come to one of 2 conclusion. This is all that we are. This is not all that we are. The second is the most basic article of faith.
YOU are the one who claims to know these facts (i.e God Dun Itz). I simply point out how absurd, stupid and obviously fabricated your claims are.Who are you, really? And why are you here? You claim to know the working of the Universe so much so that your conclusion of the Universe is right and mine is wrong... back it up! Go on, show me Oh mighty one why your conclusion is so superior!
You haven't established anything to refute. What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. You are wrong. Bad Dog!How old are you? 142?
You actually haven't refuted anything. You've just sat on your perceived high horse and gone "NA NA NA NA NA You're WRONG! You're SOOOOO WRONG. HA HA HA I'm so smart and you're so dumb..."
evidence... now.
I an intellectually honest person and must hence point out to idiots that they are indeed idiots.So you're on an Atheistic evangelistic crusade now? But I thought spreading your ideas to those who don't want to is immoral? Well at least that's the impression you give.
Against an invisible sky daddy? How about...hmm.....Theres no good reason to believe in one.....the burden of proof is on you.....your quite slow at this aren't you..I'm still waiting on an adult argument from you...
LOL and how would I disprove this! How sad that you evade my question. How would I prove this. What evidence would you except?Simple. Disprove that Jesus did what the Bible says he did. I've already said that.
Wow just wow. No! Just no. Don't assert silly things and expect people to take your silly rants seriously. You may have just said 'The Matrix is is based on Historical events. Without which, all is meaningless....and I can have all the premarital orgies I want and get pissed as I want whenever I want.Christianity is based on Historical events. Without which, all is meaningless... and I can have all the premarital orgies I want and get as pissed as I want whenever I want
Youd have to say that despite having all our needs provided for and our close relationship with our maker, thru our free will we chose to not be content with this state of paradise. Rather we chose to have knowledge of good and evil, with a deluded view of obtaining a power to rival that of the maker's.Please explain why humans deserve an eternity of immense suffering for simply existing.
Qua? Which post sorry... I though i got them all in one of my many... many... MANY large posts.Teclis, any reason you ignored my last reply on inherent morality/immorality in humans?
+1youd have to say that despite having all our needs provided for and our close relationship with our maker, thru our free will we chose to not be content with this state of paradise. Rather we chose to have knowledge of good and evil, with a deluded view of obtaining a power to rival that of the maker's.
Whether this choice to deliberately part from god's company was inevitable or not is, imo, too complicated to attempt to answer. God has immense respect for our freedom and the choice to seek and follow him is always a positive one which is essentially unaffected by external realities.
But the highest calling of every man is to seek and know christ. The creation of all of us holds this seed at its core. To be reunited with the father is his greatest wish for us, as demonstrated by christ's sacrifice. You see, death and suffering is not of god. There was never any intention that we should perish at all in this world. But the choice of death - the choice to reject the life that is the creator- holds the curse of mortality. This is because evil is ultimately weaker than good; it cannot go on forever - it must perish and it will perish. Death is satan's price for our vain, lustful self-delusions - not god's. All he wants is for you to come back to him and choose the life and truth that we rejected
Please explain to me the Trinity, because I have never been able to understand it. Whenever I ask someone, it's always like:I think It's actually pretty easy to understand. God exists in three parts, wholly the same, yet seperate. Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
Christianity isn't based on historical events, it's based on the existence of God. Jesus comes and all that other stuff comes afterwards. Now, the existence of God cannot be proven through events that might of happened over 2000 years ago.Simple. Disprove that Jesus did what the Bible says he did. I've already said that. Christianity is based on Historical events. Without which, all is meaningless... and I can have all the premarital orgies I want and get as pissed as I want whenever I want
Sounds like something out of Lord of the Rings, to be quite honest.Youd have to say that despite having all our needs provided for and our close relationship with our maker, thru our free will we chose to not be content with this state of paradise. Rather we chose to have knowledge of good and evil, with a deluded view of obtaining a power to rival that of the maker's.
Whether this choice to deliberately part from God's company was inevitable or not is, imo, too complicated to attempt to answer. God has immense respect for our freedom and the choice to seek and follow Him is always a positive one which is essentially unaffected by external realities.
But the highest calling of every man is to seek and know Christ. The creation of all of us holds this seed at its core. To be reunited with the Father is His greatest wish for us, as demonstrated by Christ's sacrifice. You see, death and suffering is not of God. There was never any intention that we should perish at all in this world. But the choice of death - the choice to reject the Life that is the Creator- holds the curse of mortality. This is because evil is ultimately weaker than good; it cannot go on forever - it must perish and it will perish. Death is Satan's price for our vain, lustful self-delusions - not God's. All He wants is for you to come back to Him and choose the Life and Truth that we rejected
For someone who claims to be academic, this is the WORST kind of mindset you can have.In my eyes, you are equal with those that believe in astrology, Zeus and a living Elvis. There is no way to argue with your type; and hence you must be treated akin to a dog; told no! bad dog! no!
Question: Have you read it? Cover to cover? I'm hoping so... firstly because If you did you'd understand that the Genesis creation story is the only "explaining" in the book. And it is poetry in Hebrew... not meant to be a Scientific description. It's entire point being that God created the Universe. The rest of the Old Testament is a Historical record of the Israelites and their interaction with God.The Bible was an early attempt at explaining the world around us. It is a failed attempt. It is to be discarded to Mythos; with the likes of Baal, Athena and every other God.
Is this what you spend your time doing? I would HATE to be your children, or your friend even. If at the mention of God you call someone a dog. That's a GREAT way to get yourself smashed in the face... or are you too chicken to actually say it to someones face?No. Bad!
I just explained that twice... If you don't get it, and it really is simple, then here is one of the keys of reasoned argument. Know the perspective of the opposite side, and try and see it from their perspective. On my side of the fence, where God exists, and the Bible is his word, the Bible makes reference to it... therefore I believe it (but don't pretend that I understand how it works)You say you don't know the mind of god. But righht here you explicity claim that you know that nature of God, How on earth do you support these bizarre claims about God being '3 separate but not separate parts'.
I didn't ask Jesus to die for me, If I was present at the time I would have done all I could to stop the torture of an innocent person, By what right does he 'die' for my sins? Nauseating stuff.
Well Hinduism... where all Gods are acceptable... even the ones that say there is only one God... is self Contradictory pluralism. Judaism points towards the Messiah-Christ still coming. Only problem with that, is if you look at ALL the prophecies of the Old Testament, Jesus ticks ALL the boxes. Islam bases its knowledge of God from Muhammed's interactions with him in a cave. Christianity bases itself on real life events involving real people... and without those events it falls apart.Furthermore by you being a Christian implies that you Know that your God is the correct one (Islam? Judaism? Hinduism? ad infinitum)....
No! Bad!
As a Historical source... you're telling me to ignore the Criterion of Coherance, the Criterion of dissimilarity, the Criterion of Archaic style, the criterion of embarrassment, the criterion of memorability and the criterion of date (particularly in reference to what scholars call source Q, as well as the Oral tradition of the time and the relatively short time between Jesus' death and the writing of the Gospels?'Historical facts' do not include the delusions of the indoctrinated and their pathetic fabrications. You do relize when the New Testament was written and by who and for what purpose...it was of course doctored to and 'stack up'....you ignorance is astounding....stop reading books written by Christians for Christians to Confirm Christians.
What on EARTH are you talking about? You don't pick parts out... that's what I'm getting at. It has to be taken in context as a whole.Einstein definitely wasn't a Christian...
How do you know what parts in the bible are the good parts, on what criteria do you pick and chose if the bible is meant to be the fundamental criteria. You should probably look up the word 'evolution'.
......... when they ask me not to share my beliefs with them, I don't. I'm not going to alienate them as a friend by shoving it down their throats.You agree to let them go to hell? Some friend...
You know calling me a dog isn't aggravating... it just makes you look like a toolIts quite sad that your defending the bible. A baby can point out how absurd it is. No! Bad Dog! No!
1) Circumsicion is irrelevant to Christians... that's Jews... so wtf?You will indoctrinate your Children....great what a surprise....
Will you circumsize them as well? When do they get to decide about that? Nauseating.
pretty sure it is irrelevant and says nothing...And what does this say about the probability of your specific believes being true? Pathetic.....
Says you... what proof do we have of this? I'm pretty sure saying "No bad dog" isn't proof of anything. This isn't the only time you've used this line... yet you haven't once proven your GREAT knowledge. Why don't you share some of your wisdom then rather that just saying "this has been conclusively refuted"... give us some real references to scholarly works. Philosophical, scientific... while you're at it, paraphrase/summarise it for the lamans and the dogs.I can guarantee you my understanding of religion, philosophy, epistemology, ontology and science is far more sophisticated than your own. You read the Origins of Species? clap clap well you obviously didn't assimilate a word.
You freaking Straw manned the use of the straw man argument. The existence of the argument between us is proof enough of my point, let alone the existence of religion in the world... let alone philosophy.There is no concrete proof for against Zeus, against Baal, against invisible teapots. Well done, way to repeat the most boring and pathetic of straw man arguments against Atheism. Embarrassing really.
Because I don't agree that that is evidence, I don't have to refute it. In fact I don't have to even refute it as a source... therefore I can always win an argument. This is SUCH a great way to get my point across... I'm so happyYou haven't established anything to refute. What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. You are wrong. Bad Dog!
WTF? How did I evade the question.LOL and how would I disprove this! How sad that you evade my question. How would I prove this. What evidence would you except?
So Christianity ISN'T based on the claim that 2000 years ago existed a man named Yeshua ben Yosef, who performed miracles and claimed to be the Son of God, the Messiah prophesised by the Israelites for more than a thousand years. He didn't die on a cross... etc etc etc. If Jesus didn't perform the miracles he did, say the things he did, do the things he did... then Christianity is a lie.Wow just wow. No! Just no. Don't assert silly things and expect people to take your silly rants seriously. You may have just said 'The Matrix is is based on Historical events. Without which, all is meaningless....and I can have all the premarital orgies I want and get pissed as I want whenever I want.
Ok... I went and bothered to learn these things for myself. Read intellectual and scholarly articles from all sides on many of the subjects. If everything I've said has been refuted a thousand times... show me where... show me PLEASE.Nothing you say is clever or new, nothing you say hasn't been conclusively refuted a thousand times. All your responses are so predictable; you have been sold the exact same dogma and the exact same way to defend it as all the others, and it comes out like clockwork.
Why on Earth do you think I did all that research???????????? Read all those incredibly taxing books?How about, for 5 minutes, you imagine that God does not exist and that Christianity is a cult like the thousands of other 'true' religions.
(Yes I know this isn't a serious question) The beauty of Omnipotency is that he could it... then eat it anywayscould god heat up a burito so hot that even he could not eat it?
Well Jesus wasn't an imperfect man. He was fully man, and fully God... I'm not sure how it works... It's one of those things that makes me go "ok I'll accept it, but expect a question when i get to heaven... because it don't make sense!"Hey, I have difficulty understanding, how God, almighty, ubiquitious etc is also human (Jesus). You are essentially worshipping a human being who ate, slept, excreted etc - how does imperfect man pose as perfect God?
Just wanted to know...feel free to answer my query.
I think that the best way to think of it is like a Venn Diagram... three circles overlapping each other. Yes God sent himself, as Jesus, to die. After Jesus' ascension, God, sent himself to earth, as the Holy Spirit. Fully whole fully seperate. I dunno, that just makes sense to me, In a twisted paraconsistent way.Please explain to me the Trinity, because I have never been able to understand it. Whenever I ask someone, it's always like:
Them: "well, ya see, it's like this: God is three but he is one."
Me: "So he's three?"
Them: "Yup. And one?"
Me: "So does that mean God sent himself to die on the cross?"
Them: "No, the Father sent the son"
Me: "But they're both God?"
Them: "Yup"
Me: "So 1 God + 1 God = 2 Gods"
Them: "No. Father + Son + Spirit = 1 God"
Me: "?????"
Sorry let me rephrase. It falls apart at a fundamental level. I think if you had that problem then you would probably have issues with alot of logical argument based on the past...Christianity isn't based on historical events, it's based on the existence of God. Jesus comes and all that other stuff comes afterwards. Now, the existence of God cannot be proven through events that might of happened over 2000 years ago.
It has always seemed to me like a concept which people pretend to understand, so they can disregard the idea that Christianity may just be a polytheistic religion.I think that the best way to think of it is like a Venn Diagram... three circles overlapping each other. Yes God sent himself, as Jesus, to die. After Jesus' ascension, God, sent himself to earth, as the Holy Spirit. Fully whole fully seperate. I dunno, that just makes sense to me, In a twisted paraconsistent way.
That would be true - and that would make a very strange, exceedingly skeptical person - one who, because of this skepticism alone, would be sent to hell.Sorry let me rephrase. It falls apart at a fundamental level. I think if you had that problem then you would probably have issues with alot of logical argument based on the past...
He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary who was the only human since Adam and Eve free of original sin.Hey, I have difficulty understanding, how God, almighty, ubiquitious etc is also human (Jesus). You are essentially worshipping a human being who ate, slept, excreted etc - how does imperfect man pose as perfect God?
Just wanted to know...feel free to answer my query.
Edit: I personally would never cite cite anything to support historicity of the NT. You're really on an uphill battle then, so it's better to just avoid it, imo.Teclis said:1) Around AD 55
But you are equal with those that believe in Zeus, The Matrix, Baal, etc....For someone who claims to be academic, this is the WORST kind of mindset you can have.
I'm egotistical because I don't believe in Zeus and fairies and Santa Claus?Well that makes sense... just as I thought, you're intolerant and egotistical. And every post you've made on this forum proves the point. You don't only think you're better than me... but smarter than everyone and highly enlightened! Oh my... you're attempting to be Richard Dawkins! :O
Sorry I must have mistaken this Beautiful Poetry! for something more sinister:Question: Have you read it? Cover to cover? I'm hoping so... firstly because If you did you'd understand that the Genesis creation story is the only "explaining" in the book. And it is poetry in Hebrew... not meant to be a Scientific description. It's entire point being that God created the Universe. The rest of the Old Testament is a Historical record of the Israelites and their interaction with God.
A Christian would smash me in the face for calling his belief in god stupid??? Why am I not surprised, If they where in Government I am sure I would be put to death (that is after I was tortured and made to confess my blasphemy). Aren't you a nasty little bigot.Is this what you spend your time doing? I would HATE to be your children, or your friend even. If at the mention of God you call someone a dog. That's a GREAT way to get yourself smashed in the face... or are you too chicken to actually say it to someones face?
So If the bible is God's word (as you have just explicitly confessed) then you must take the above passages about slavery and murder as Gods word. Nauseating. But let me guess; I've taken it out of context!!! Your meant to ignore that part!!!! AS i said before; on what criteria to you pick and chose which parts are literal which parts are poetry, on which criteria, obviously it can't be on God's word (the bible) because thats what your picking apart.I just explained that twice... If you don't get it, and it really is simple, then here is one of the keys of reasoned argument. Know the perspective of the opposite side, and try and see it from their perspective. On my side of the fence, where God exists, and the Bible is his word, the Bible makes reference to it... therefore I believe it (but don't pretend that I understand how it works)
??there is no evidence for Jesus's miracles other than word of the bronze age sand people that wished to make him his God. The burden of proof is on you.Well Hinduism... where all Gods are acceptable... even the ones that say there is only one God... is self Contradictory pluralism. Judaism points towards the Messiah-Christ still coming. Only problem with that, is if you look at ALL the prophecies of the Old Testament, Jesus ticks ALL the boxes. Islam bases its knowledge of God from Muhammed's interactions with him in a cave. Christianity bases itself on real life events involving real people... and without those events it falls apart.
hahaha books written by members of a cult find that the cult is the one truth!!!! I could site a thousand books that conclude the word of the Koran is the only truth...!!! Congrats man your such a clever lad!As a Historical source... you're telling me to ignore the Criterion of Coherance, the Criterion of dissimilarity, the Criterion of Archaic style, the criterion of embarrassment, the criterion of memorability and the criterion of date (particularly in reference to what scholars call source Q, as well as the Oral tradition of the time and the relatively short time between Jesus' death and the writing of the Gospels?
And here's a lovely list of books I've read on the topic... most of them of the scholarly middle (a couple of sceptics and a couple of apologists too). I'd say it's a pretty balanced and comprehensive list, wouldn't you?
Barbara Thiering - Jesus the man
George A. Wells - The Jesus Legend
Gerd Ludemann - Jesus after two thousand years: What he really said and did.
Gary Habermas - The Historical Jesus
Raymond Brown - The Death of the Messiah (two volumes)
Marcus J. Borg - Jesus: A New Vision
James Charlesworth - Jesus' Jewishness
John Dominic Crossan - The Historical Jesus
Richard Horsley - Archaeology, History and Society in Galilee
John Kloppenborg Verbin - Excavating Q
Birger Gerhardsson - The Reliability of the Gospel Tradition
Sean Freyne - Galilee and the Gospel
Morna D. Hooker - The Signs of a prophet
Christopher Tucket - Q and the History of early Christianity
Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to death. (Exodus 21:15 NAB)What on EARTH are you talking about? You don't pick parts out... that's what I'm getting at. It has to be taken in context as a whole.
Your not a true Christian then............ when they ask me not to share my beliefs with them, I don't. I'm not going to alienate them as a friend by shoving it down their throats.
Ah but retarded parenting is Christian parenting.1) Circumsicion is irrelevant to Christians... that's Jews... so wtf?
2) Indoctrination assumes I force my beliefs on them. If my children don't want to go to Church, I'll be cut, but I'm not going to make them. I'll even pay for a babysitter to come when I go to church myself to look after them. Same as my parents did. I'm not going to be Ned Flanders and read them Christian bedtime stories every night and refuse to allow them to see anything other than Christian cartoons til they're 10. That's just retarded parenting.
I am sharing my wisdom..Says you... what proof do we have of this? I'm pretty sure saying "No bad dog" isn't proof of anything. This isn't the only time you've used this line... yet you haven't once proven your GREAT knowledge. Why don't you share some of your wisdom then rather that just saying "this has been conclusively refuted"... give us some real references to scholarly works. Philosophical, scientific... while you're at it, paraphrase/summarise it for the lamans and the dogs.
So? You still obviously didn't assimilate a word.I said I STARTED with the Origin of Species... usually a good idea to start with the most influential work on the topic.
Wow your really thick...really thick..You freaking Straw manned the use of the straw man argument. The existence of the argument between us is proof enough of my point, let alone the existence of religion in the world... let alone philosophy.
Babbling again...Because I don't agree that that is evidence, I don't have to refute it. In fact I don't have to even refute it as a source... therefore I can always win an argument. This is SUCH a great way to get my point across... I'm so happy
hahaha you still evade the question...What proof would you ACCEPT? give me examples i.e The Shroud of Turin being found to be a pathetic fabrication (which it has been anyway).WTF? How did I evade the question.
Q: What information would convince you to reject Christianity and the existence of a God?
A: Disprove that Jesus did what the Bible says he did.
Show me that the Gospels are a misrepresentation, show me that the Bible was doctored, show me that Jesus didn't exist, show me that the Bible was changed along the way to suit the purposes of the Churches leaders... anything along those lines
There where many prophets....all under a delusionSo Christianity ISN'T based on the claim that 2000 years ago existed a man named Yeshua ben Yosef, who performed miracles and claimed to be the Son of God, the Messiah prophesised by the Israelites for more than a thousand years. He didn't die on a cross... etc etc etc. If Jesus didn't perform the miracles he did, say the things he did, do the things he did... then Christianity is a lie.
Yes your meant to read stuff that opposes your view.Ok... I went and bothered to learn these things for myself. Read intellectual and scholarly articles from all sides on many of the subjects. If everything I've said has been refuted a thousand times... show me where... show me PLEASE.
Why on Earth do you think I did all that research???????????? Read all those incredibly taxing books?
*iron age, urbanised people.ad infinitum said:??there is no evidence for Jesus's miracles other than word of the bronze age sand people that wished to make him his God.
Quick induction-babble
Don't expect this sick notion of vicarious redemption though child sacrifice to make sense to anyone other than the utterly deluded.
You're the arrogant one: you proclaim to know the mind of god; you are the one who proclaims certainty. You are the one who belongs to a cult which has persecuted and converted anyone who dissents for a thousand years. No one will forgot what society was like when people like you where in charge (i.e the Inquisition). You are the bigot that presumes that you have a secret pact with 'god' and that anyone who dissents is sent to hell.
Nothing you have said could be described as 'reasoned' or 'researched'. You are a brain washed (obviously your parents are Christians and you have been taught like a good submissive prole) cultist in a long line of brainwashed cultists, and nothing about your particular cult is worthy of my refutation. You can submit and worship your master in private, but you must leave the rest of us out of it. I do not want to be a pet, but by all means put on your invisible gimp suit and be the plaything of your 'savior' but don't you dare push your grotesques, babyish rambling on the rest of us.
MOST of those men and women AREN'T Christians... look them up. Go on... they're all highly respected academics...hahaha books written by members of a cult find that the cult is the one truth!!!! I could site a thousand books that conclude the word of the Koran is the only truth...!!! Congrats man your such a clever lad!
It doesn't seem as if you did.Qua? Which post sorry... I though i got them all in one of my many... many... MANY large posts.
My reply-Are you telling me that the deeds that sexual desire and selfishness lead too aren't immoral. Rape, paedophilia, subjugation of women, theft, war over land and resources, the gap between rich and poor... need I go on?
And why women aren't as violent, they do commit violent acts. Such as murder...
Even If there wasn't religion, I still think you would have to look at human nature and see that while we have a capacity for immense good, If we are not told that things are wrong, our default position is "it feels good, therefore I'll do it"...
Sadly "religion" has a lot to answer for in terms of Morality. Any true Christian hates religion... It was the religous people who killed Jesus. Jesus went to the Prostitues, the tax collectors (traitors who stole from their fellow citizens to fund their oppressors), the broken people and said "You're sinners..." and they said "Yea I am... save me"
Then he went to the religious people... The ones who had it all together, who followed all the rules and said "You're sinners..." and they said "fuck you... why would you eat and talk with THOSE people! We don't have sex outside of marriage, we don't steal, we don't kill people... So we don't like you very much... so we're gunna kill you"
Religion vs. Redemption is one of the biggest problems in the Christian church. Religion is making a list of rules... "you have to do these 10 things to get into Heaven".. Redemption is Jesus saying on the cross "It is finished"... and it's all been done for us... so yea.
I said they aren't necessarily immoral, meaning sexual desire and selfishness are entirely compatible with a moral position. They are also compatible with immoral acts, as in the examples you mentioned.
An extremely small minority frequently display violent tendencies. Do you honestly believe that the remainder are merely suppressing their violent urges?
To an extent that's true, but it is an oversimplification. Humans are capable of empathy, and acting upon hedonistic desires can be easily be limited to what doesn't cause harm to others.
What you've said here is mostly incoherent, and almost entirely irrelevant to the overall argument.
I thought I'd addressed that in one of my posts... I'll have a look through and see.It doesn't seem as if you did.
Your post-
My reply-
Hitchens is a Dickwad... he's an angry, alcoholic ex-Trotskyist who supports the legalising of Marijuana, defends George Bush's Foreign Policy post 9/11 and doesn't attack criticisms of his arguments, but attempts to discredit the people making the criticisms...Quick induction-
Based on your venacular, your a Hitchens fan