When I work in the whole careers market scene, I make it my business not to lie or mislead people. I've noticed that a lot of people do lie and mislead, however, simply in order to conform to the rules of careers markets and to avoid any sort of trouble - whether it's legal trouble or simply getting in an argument with someone.
Macquarie is definitely well respected in some areas; actuarial studies, economics, education, history are all certainly well-regarded inside and outside Australia.
However if I were to be a lawyer, or simply wanted to study law, I would avoid Macquarie like the plague. I would say that even UWS might be better for some areas of law than Macquarie. Likewise if I wanted to do medical science or engineering; there are far better places than Macquarie.
The same sorts of things can be said for any uni, really, although some unis have more positives than others.
Put another spin on it: Graphic design, photography, film, music, etc. I get asked about that area a lot. University is probably the worst place you can go if you want to be a graphic designer, photographer, etc. Go to a private college and get practical experience. Yes, universities do offer these courses, but they all pale in comparison to even the decent design colleges like Raffles, Billy Blue, etc. Even a fantastic place like COFA is becoming far too theoretical, which is fine given it's a university.
totally agree with everything you said there there. great post.
As retarded as your claim of "universities don't matter at all"?
My analogy was just to illustrate that university does matter. Yes the gap is very large between UWS and UNSW. UWS is not even top 500 in the world. Not even close.
yes i'm sure it is large, but it is nowhere near as large as UWS and Harvard so using those two universities is not a great idea.
and in saying that, those 'top universities' are
a) a matter of a panel of peoples opinion (which is valid, i'm sure but nonetheless very hard to be subjective)
b) as you get closer and closer to the top, its total wankfest as to who actually deserves number 1 or 2 or 3 etc. because i think they'd just be splitting hairs getting so close. its not like uni number 100 has toilets and university number 300 does not have toilets on campus. do some research into the top universities before assuming its a cut and dry ranking system. its like the top 100 in the state for uai, does number 100 a complete dumbass and number 1 a genius? not realy
c) its very hard to quantitatively measure how great a university is unless you strictly measure employment prospects, pay, etc. (Which isn't necessarily the best way to measure a university's quality) and even in saying that, its upto an individual to get a job or employed.
the only reason harvard, oxford, cambridge etc. get jobs so readily is because employers invite the graduates out to dinners! they offer them jobs, they dont make them work over summer for peanuts and _may_ offer them a position.
and also, by making a uni batshit insane hard to get into (lets set the issue of quality aside) chances are they will study their ass off to remain there and go well. its kinda like if you oppress someone they will either cave in our boune back and go better than they normally would.
the above explains why 1st and 2nd generation immigration people tend to own about 4 houses but drive a 1982 ford cortina
Hmmm, because most people's parents know a lot about university. Sounds like a great elitist attitude to have, none of the above mentioned things should be looked down upon, we all have talents and they differ from others. University is not for everyone and someone should not be looked down upon because they went to tafe or did an apprenticeship. Please do not suggest for a second that someone who goes to tafe, UWS, works at coles or does an apprenticeship does not work as hard as someone else, yes maybe the work is different but hard work is hard work, commitment is commitment and class is seeing that different is not bad, wrong or any less.
exactly. how else did migrants without any degree or even high school make it big? sacrafice? ambition. our generation is way too greedy and self centered and expect too much too soon
UWS Law isn't regarded highly at all. Good luck transferring to USYD, UNSW or UTS law with a 90 ATAR.
Quite a few UWS students get into MQ and UTS law with a decent GPA, but of course you wouldn't know that because you're still doing your HSC. Keep in mind just because you did UWS doesn't mean your ATAR was 90, a lot of people in UWS law get between 95 and 90, thus they don't quite make the MQ or UTS cut off but manage to later with a good GPA. Its also no more difficult than doing something like Arts at USYD/UNSW/UTS and then trying to transfer into the law program.
She's right. ive seen people get into law with lower uai's than 90 but a great GPA and we all know how batshit insane hard it is to get into unsw law. I also know for a fact that UWS law is frowned upon, my friend does law at uws and she said everywhere she applied for a job they told her they prefer unsw/usyd graduates first. even if you are at unsw or usyd (or even uts) to get a decent law grad position u need great marks, the battle never stops
edit: i realise i contradicted myself with the above statement, when i said 'uni doesn't matter' i was quoting what I was told at the careers expo in August sometime, i still was a bit ~ about that statement