jennyfromdabloc
coked up sociopath
Dude, just admit you were wrong and said something stupid. I do it all the time.No, I'm not. I still regard it as a non-issue. It's so negligible, so insignificant, that I regard it as a non-issue.
You even admit later in the same post: "Okay, there's racism towards whites from Aborigines."
If you were the victim I'm sure you wouldn't consider it insignificant. If you were running a school, or a business and there was very small amount of racism in the organization, would you dismiss it as insignificant?
I admitted right from the beginning that: "The rates (of racial victimization) are higher for non whites."Irrelevant? Even though it's a direct result of racism? Okay, there's racism towards whites from Aborigines. Granted, now please, tell me what that's doing to our standard of living, our quality of life. The unemployment rate with Aborigines is about 35%, ours about 5%. They die 17 years earlier. More likely to be imprisoned than go to university. And countless other figures that illustrate their disadvantage, which is a result of white racism. Give me some equally devastating statistics about the implications of Aboriginal racism on white people in the big picture. Go on.
Stop changing your argument around and making me repeat myself and just admit you made stupid post.
I don't think its widely recognized that if someone in your family does damage, you are on the hook for the damage. How does this even work? Who is responsible? If I do damage as an adult are my parents morally obligated to pay the victim; what about my siblings, or my grandparents, or aunts? This is the first I have heard of this so called moral. The generally acceptable moral principle is that people are responsible for their own actions.Well if morals aren't recognised by the legal system then I suppose we shouldn't pay any attention to them.
You also conveniently didn't quote the rest of that post about how weak the analogy is anyway. You have also provided no justification for why such a moral would make any sense.
What stuff? What is happening now that I am responsible for? Why should I be responsible for the actions of the government anyway, especially since I am against the government.Um, you're in Australia right now, unless I'm sorely mistaken. And all "this stuff" is still happening to the "abbos".
Are Germans responsible for what their government did, are Americans personally responsible for the harm their government is doing in the middle east?
WRONG. We both used the words "whites," there is nothing wrong with that, its just pragmatic.You accused me of being hypocritical in my approach to the concept of race; as I criticised it then also used it. I told you why I did this, and acknowledge you also did it. In referring to "races" doing things, you did it. We were doing exactly the same thing.
You made generalizations about whites as a race saying they are responsible for all this bad stuff. I made no such generalization about any race because I believe such generalizations to be foolish.
I did not make a single generalization about any race, I referred some individuals who happen to be aboriginals being racist to some people who happen to be white. I never referred to either of these groups collectively as all behaving in a particular way.
Last edited: