Crestwood's_G
In Elegance
i said overpriced lol...id rather a hyundai excelits one of the cheapest cars you can buy
with excellent build quality
what
i said overpriced lol...id rather a hyundai excelits one of the cheapest cars you can buy
with excellent build quality
what
because excels are cheap and efficient cars...yeah and i disagree because it is cheap
why the fuck would you want an excel at all
haha BS...its only a death trap if a shit driver is behind the wheel+ death traps with horrible handling, no power, horrible gearboxes, horrible interior and they are death traps
You can't expect EVERYTHING on the road. What if someone else hits you?haha BS...its only a death trap if a shit driver is behind the wheel
lol I don't care much for the rest but reliability? Really?sure u can go on about how a certain car is safe, but personally i dont give a shit about safety features, nor do i care about fuel efficiency, nor reliability....
The newer Korean cars are a marked improvement on the old ones though... I don't think anyone would argue that Hyundai and Kia have not significantly improved since the Excel days. They now have great build quality and reliability... but lack the driving finesse or good design which the rivals have. But hey, an improvement which drives down prices isn't ab ad thing.korean cars are shit compared to jap cars
kia/hyundais are just homo, look at their pathetic attempt to create a sports car in the tiburon/cerato koup, as well as their "luxury" range, consisting of genesis/grand-something, in the US which is pretty feeble, compared to the superior japanese sports range of wrxs/skylines/lexus
volvos/saabs are expensive and ugly, i hate them, and also peugeuts, they are quite crap...
sure u can go on about how a certain car is safe, but personally i dont give a shit about safety features, nor do i care about fuel efficiency, nor reliability....
styling/interiors/performance/size of rims should be more important, due to the age of this forum's users
final verdict: saab 9-3 convertible, worst way to spend 70k imo
Wrong. Most cars wouldn't make it 3 years without decent servicing. My mums charade which has done just under 100000k has been serviced exactly twice and has no issues and runs like its new.reliability isnt a serious issue? unless your car is ancient or has been trashed around, im sure any reasonably new 2000s car or maybe even post 1993, in good condition can start regularly for another 5 years
and @ spade, i never said im a big car's person, im just dissing specific cars/makes based on what i find important in a car. basically, looks/interior/origin/performance
the 206, is bad looking, has poor interiors, and is from france
Saab was great until it was GMified and thus shittified. Pretty much everything they've made in the last decade are rebadges or remodels that show no real improvement.As for Saab 9-3... Saab used to be a great company. Pity they ended the way they did. Even with selling rebadged WRXes with some Saab design input, they were headed for the grave long ago when they had absolutely nothing new coming out worth looking at... but continued to charge a pretty penny for it. Pity!