Kwayera
Passive-aggressive Mod
Lol morality/immorality. Was there ever a more flawed and subjective concept?
Christians base their own personal morals from those of God and through the study of his scriptures.Lol morality/immorality. Was there ever a more flawed and subjective concept?
The new bible is, the old bible was full of homosexual orgies.Christians base their own personal morals from those of God and through the study of his scriptures.
There are some sections of the Bible which do lend themseleves to debate but the issue of homosexuality and sexual morality is not one of them. The Bible's stance towards such conducts is quite clear.
There are passages in both the New and Old Testaments which condemn homosexuality, Leviticus in the Old Testament and Romans in the New, for example.The new bible is, the old bible was full of homosexual orgies.
Lol but Our Saviour commanded us to spread the good news. Who is it who commands you to sleep with your own gender?There is no need to preach. You will not die by not doing so. Control yourself Christians.
That's great. Flaw in your thinking: not everyone is Christian. Not everyone wants to be. Not everyone believes in the divinity of the Bible, or in divinity at all. Therefore, kindly keep such flawed personal morals PERSONAL. If you don't like homosexuality (or rather, homosexual acts) then don't do it, and cease and desist getting involved in other people's PERSONAL BUSINESS if they choose to be homosexual/perform homosexual acts.Christians base their own personal morals from those of God and through the study of his scriptures.
There are some sections of the Bible which do lend themseleves to debate but the issue of homosexuality and sexual morality is not one of them. The Bible's stance towards such conducts is quite clear.
Do you mean to say that you don't want to spread the good news, you only do it out of servitude?Lol but Our Saviour commanded us to spread the good news. Who is it who commands you to sleep with your own gender?
hint::angry:
Calling for homosexuality to be banned and to continue withholding rights from homosexuals (i.e. to marry, to adopt, etc) is pretty invasive into what should be one's own personal morality.How exactly are we really getting involved? This is a public forum. We are airing legitimate views which you kindly and mysteriously condemn as "flawed". NCAP is PUBLIC BUSINESS; if you choose to disagree, then OK GUY
Nice deflectThere are many things that God requires of me which id rather not do. Christ wasnt particularly happy about crucifixion either, guy
Lol marriage is a public expression. The welfare of children is also of public concern. These are not merely matters of personal morality bc their impacts are beyond the individual's conscience and into the real and tangible material world!Calling for homosexuality to be banned and to continue withholding rights from homosexuals (i.e. to marry, to adopt, etc) is pretty invasive into what should be one's own personal morality.
Both those issues have nothing to do with same-sex marriages/unions. Having legally recognised same-sex marriages/unions does not negatively impact upon the public or the welfare of children.Lol marriage is a public expression. The welfare of children is also of public concern. These are not merely matters of personal morality bc their impacts are beyond the individual's conscience and into the real and tangible material world!
A-doi!
Well that's your view. We believe that it would. Right. Square one is fun!Having legally recognised same-sex marriages/unions does not negatively impact upon the public .
How does it? I've heard your views about gay adoption and gays raising children.Well that's your view. We believe that it would. Right. Square one is fun!
Am I arguing this too?How does it? I've heard your views about gay adoption and gays raising children.
But how does merely allowing a marriage to occur affect children?