Reasons for racism. (3 Viewers)

[thongetsu]

OMG i love HIYMYM and Robin is pretty funny!

 

[scuba_steve2121]

OMG i love HIYMYM and Robin is pretty funny!

Barney FTW

 

[thongetsu]

BARNEY is the funniest! He brings all the humour onto the show IMO. It's so weird that he's gay IRL and man-whore in the show.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

BARNEY is the funniest! He brings all the humour onto the show IMO. It's so weird that he's gay IRL and man-whore in the show.

yea but you see past it

i love when he talks about Canadian porn. "let me tell you something their universal health care system doesn't cover breast implants. if i have to sit through another flat chest Nova Scotian riding a Mountie on the back of a Zamboni I'm going to go oot of my mind" well at least thats how i remember it

 

[thongetsu]

I wasn't saying his sexuality was bad, just saying it makes the character he plays even cooler!

 

[thongetsu]

thread is derailing in slow-motion.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

I wasn't saying his sexuality was bad, just saying it makes the character he plays even cooler!

i meant seeing past the weirdness aspect of it idc that hes gay

 

[Crestwood's_G]

I heard Canada is more accepting of its migrants. Less boganism to go around. Even the rednecks there have that Canadian charm.

i heard japanese have less gookism going around...and theyre more accepting of their migrants too

 

[thongetsu]

i meant seeing past the weirdness aspect of it idc that hes gay

idc that he's gay either, just that it was shocking when i found out after watching HIMYM. He's a really really good actor.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

idc that he's gay either, just that it was shocking when i found out after watching HIMYM. He's a really really good actor.

as the great barney once said "Marshall i guess in time you can learn to love yourself for the unique little snowflake that you are. OR!! you can change your entire personality which is just SO much easier!!!

 

[cosmo kramer]

The person who manages this forum is a big enough homosexual to delete threads, so I am reposting this in here.

If white is right, then why is the majority of white people stupid?
I'm pretty sure you have technology that is owned and made in an Asian country e.g. your computer. And if you don't your technology probably sucks.

Stupid relative to whom? The European causasoid IQ average is approximately one standard deviation above the global mean, which comfortably places whites near the top of the global IQ distribution for population groups. Northern Asians (not South East Asian trash like the Vietnamese) are the only major population group with a higher IQ mean than whites; a modest but still significant gap of about three to four points accompanied by a vastly different cognitive profile separates the two populations. While Northern Asians are in fact more intelligent than whites on average, to reduce capability solely to the IQ construct from a psychometric point of view is deeply foolish. While Asians tend to outscore whites in this domain, when it comes to the openness of personality construct, which is heavily related to personal creativity, whites tend to outscore asians by at least 1.5 standard deviations, (a whopping difference). Much less is known about this construct, but I feel as if this observed difference does in fact have real world validity and observability; Asians are overrepresented in the fields of progamming and engineering and are frequently commended and stereotyped for their faculties with mathemathics, but have much higher per-capita plagiarism and patent theft rates than whites do (this could have cultural causes as well, but I would certainly not hesitate to ascribe a portion of this to a lower level of creativity amongst Asians and thus a higher proclivity to engage in intellectual property theft). While Asians are overrepresented in programming, global programming competitions are almost always won by whites, Nobel prizes are invariably won by whites, etc. All of these things are not predicted by the fact that Asians have higher IQ scores on average whites at all; which means that some other factor, most probably disparities in the openness construct, between whites and asians, is causing them instead.

When it comes to technology, Asians seem to be extremely adept at taking other people's ideas and then making them better or figuring out how to manufacture them better. The Japanese government have noted that low levels of creativity seem to be a problem amongst their people, so they have instituted incredibly expensive educational programs designed to improve the creativity of children in Japanese schools (in the same way that Western countries try to improve IQ scores of lagging minority groups through expensive and ineffective multi-year programs like HEAD START or the ABERCADIAN PROJECT). Of course, I'm not saying that the track-record of Northern Asians for technological innovation has not been extremely admirable and impressive; only, just not relative to whites. Again, this is an anomaly not predicted by the IQ averages of the two groups, and thus, points directly at the conclusion that general intelligence is not the only relevant and important psychometric construct.

But there could be heaps of potentially smart people in Africa who are unable to school.

As I have stated before, environmental disparities in Africa likely have statistically significant effects on African populations, but most certainly don't explain the entire gap between blacks and the rest of the world. The African diaspora in industrialized western countries with adequate educational facilities can be examined as to the effectiveness of education on African students (though we must take into consideration that the diaspora has considerable white admixture; they are not the same as blacks in Africa). The NLSY longtitudal samples and College Board data sets are useful for examining this question. The results are not particularly flattering...

 

[BigBoyJames -]

The person who manages this forum is a big enough homosexual to delete threads, so I am reposting this in here.



Stupid relative to whom? The European causasoid IQ average is approximately one standard deviation above the global mean, which comfortably places them near the top of the global IQ distribution for population groups. Northern Asians (not South East Asian trash like the Vietnamese) are the only major population group with a higher IQ mean than whites; a modest but still significant gap of about three to four points accompanied by a vastly different cognitive profile making up their overall scores. While Northern Asians are in fact more intelligent than whites on average, to reduce capability solely to the IQ construct from a psychometric point of view is deeply foolish. While Asians tend to outscore whites in this domain, when it comes to the openness of personality construct, which is heavily related to personal creativity, whites tend to outscore asians by at least 1.5 standard deviations, a whopping difference. Much less is known about these constructs, but I feel as if this difference does in fact have real world validity and observability; Asians are overrepresented in the fields of progamming and engineering have much higher per-capita plagiarism and patent theft rates than whites (this could have cultural causes as well, but I would certainly not hesitate to ascribe a portion of this to a lower level of creativity amongst Asians and thus a higher proclivity to engage in intellectual property theft). While Asians are overrepresented in programming, global programming competitions are almost always won by whites, Nobel prizes are invariably won by whites, etc. All of these results are in fact not predicted by IQ score differences between whites and asians at all; which means that some other factor, most probably disparities in the openness construct between whites and aisans, is causing them instead.

When it comes to technology, Asians seem to be extremely adept at taking other people's ideas and then making them better or figuring out how to manufacture them better. The Japanese have noted that low levels of creativity seem to be a problem amongst their people, so they have instituted incredibly expensive educational programs designed to improve the creativity of children in Japanese schools (in the same way that Western countries try to improve IQ scores of lagging minority groups through expensive and ineffective multi-year programs like HEAD START or the ABERCADIAN). Of course, the track-record of Northern Asians for technological innovation has been extremely admirable and impressive, but not relative to whites. This has not been predicted by the advantages Asians have over Whites in general intelligence, and point directly at the obvious conclusion that general intelligence is not the only relevant and important psychometric construct.



As I have stated before, environmental disparities in Africa likely have statistically significant effects on African populations, but most certainly don't explain the entire gap. The African diaspora in industrialized western countries with adequate educational facilities can be examined as to the effectiveness of education on African students (though we must take into consideration that the diaspora has considerable white admixture; they are not the same as blacks in Africa). The NLSY longtitudal samples or College Board data sets are useful for examining this question. The results are not particularly flattering...

you are the dumbest cunt ive never met

 

[Crestwood's_G]

The person who manages this forum is a big enough homosexual to delete threads, so I am reposting this in here.



Stupid relative to whom? The European causasoid IQ average is approximately one standard deviation above the global mean, which comfortably places them near the top of the global IQ distribution for population groups. Northern Asians (not South East Asian trash like the Vietnamese) are the only major population group with a higher IQ mean than whites; a modest but still significant gap of about three to four points accompanied by a vastly different cognitive profile making up their overall scores. While Northern Asians are in fact more intelligent than whites on average, to reduce capability solely to the IQ construct from a psychometric point of view is deeply foolish. While Asians tend to outscore whites in this domain, when it comes to the openness of personality construct, which is heavily related to personal creativity, whites tend to outscore asians by at least 1.5 standard deviations, a whopping difference. Much less is known about these constructs, but I feel as if this difference does in fact have real world validity and observability; Asians are overrepresented in the fields of progamming and engineering have much higher per-capita plagiarism and patent theft rates than whites (this could have cultural causes as well, but I would certainly not hesitate to ascribe a portion of this to a lower level of creativity amongst Asians and thus a higher proclivity to engage in intellectual property theft). While Asians are overrepresented in programming, global programming competitions are almost always won by whites, Nobel prizes are invariably won by whites, etc. All of these results are in fact not predicted by IQ score differences between whites and asians at all; which means that some other factor, most probably disparities in the openness construct between whites and aisans, is causing them instead.

When it comes to technology, Asians seem to be extremely adept at taking other people's ideas and then making them better or figuring out how to manufacture them better. The Japanese have noted that low levels of creativity seem to be a problem amongst their people, so they have instituted incredibly expensive educational programs designed to improve the creativity of children in Japanese schools (in the same way that Western countries try to improve IQ scores of lagging minority groups through expensive and ineffective multi-year programs like HEAD START or the ABERCADIAN). Of course, the track-record of Northern Asians for technological innovation has been extremely admirable and impressive, but not relative to whites. This has not been predicted by the advantages Asians have over Whites in general intelligence, and point directly at the obvious conclusion that general intelligence is not the only relevant and important psychometric construct.



As I have stated before, environmental disparities in Africa likely have statistically significant effects on African populations, but most certainly don't explain the entire gap. The African diaspora in industrialized western countries with adequate educational facilities can be examined as to the effectiveness of education on African students (though we must take into consideration that the diaspora has considerable white admixture; they are not the same as blacks in Africa). The NLSY longtitudal samples or College Board data sets are useful for examining this question. The results are not particularly flattering...

thanks for that...imma use it

 

[BigBoyJames -]

thanks for that...imma use it

so you are a racist?

 

[Crestwood's_G]

so you are a racist?

dude...ur a loser...get a life...how many accounts have u had? whats ur normal account? does ur parents know ur a loser?

 

[thongetsu]

i'm honoured that you're using my post as a sig xD

 

[Crestwood's_G]

i'm honoured that you're using my post as a sig xD

thats ok...im glad urs is more immature...and has the word mum spelt wrong

and edit:

if you actually believe in what you said in that quote ur an idiot...

cars werent invented in japan but theyre probably the biggest producers of them...so does making more of them make them smarter? even though a lot those companies probably have "white" board members anyway

 

[thongetsu]

where is the word mum?

 

[SeCKSiiMiNh]

thats ok...im glad urs is more immature...and has the word mum spelt wrong

its still funny.

 

[Crestwood's_G]

its still funny.

hows humping the word "your mom" funny? lol