Liberal or Labor? (3 Viewers)

[seanyboy]

I am an adamant Labor supporter. have been for 4 years. I beleive Kevin Rudd has done a great job. The apology, rise in the pension, getting us out of the GFC, changes to the youth allowance, investment in infastructure, the resource super-profits tax, he tired to get the ets in. They are very good achievements. Abbott as PM is a frighetning thought. Would almost want to leave the country. Couldn't stand a poor man's howard runing our country!

 

[Existential]

I am an adamant Labor supporter. have been for 4 years. I beleive Kevin Rudd has done a great job. The apology, rise in the pension, getting us out of the GFC, changes to the youth allowance, investment in infastructure, the resource super-profits tax, he tired to get the ets in. They are very good achievements. Abbott as PM is a frighetning thought. Would almost want to leave the country. Couldn't stand a poor man's howard runing our country!

:uhhuh:

 

[Chemical Ali]

We need a Royal Commission into the BER, obvious corruption is obvious.

 

[HumanDichotomy]

I don't like either Rudd or Abbott, but I'll probably vote Labor, just 'cause I can't stand the thought of having Abbott as PM.

 

[Phoenix Fury]

Equally as shit imo, re roll both party's leaders and hope at least one isn't completely retarded.

 

[Dirtbag Fashion]

lets just get the police force to police the state country

fuck the government let hte police run everything they are fair and righteous

 

[captainvagina]

labour is good. nothing wrong with kevin run taxing the rich to feed the poor

 

[Rothbard]

yeah because taxing the most productive people to help out people who refuse to work is such a good fucking idea

 

[Garygaz]

yeah because taxing the most productive people to help out people who refuse to work is such a good fucking idea

it worked for soviet ru - oh wait

 

[spazamataz]

State: Nationals
Federal: Liberals

Well the other candidates in my electorate are unheard of, so I don't see why I should vote for them. I would vote nationals in federal if i could, even though they are in the coalition, they are more in touch with people in my area and are determined to develop my area.

And lets be honest, I see the liberal party as less douchebaggy than labor.

 

[murphyad]

And lets be honest, I see the liberal party as less douchebaggy than labor.

except for Wilson Tuckey that fucking scumbag prick.

 

[absorber]

yeah because taxing the most productive people to help out people who refuse to work is such a good fucking idea

You confuse having a lot of money with being productive. Fail.

 

[withoutaface]

You confuse having a lot of money with being productive. Fail.

Having a lot of money = people want to buy what you're selling = producing shit of value to guys

 

[Existential]

I don't like either Rudd or Abbott, but I'll probably vote Labor, just 'cause I can't stand the thought of having Abbott as PM.

:uhhuh:

lets just get the police force to police the state country

fuck the government let hte police run everything they are fair and righteous

lol NO

labour is good. nothing wrong with kevin run taxing the rich to feed the poor

essentially it will only disadvantage some mining companies - not all of them.

yeah because taxing the most productive people to help out people who refuse to work is such a good fucking idea

generally elderly people are too old to work, hence the superannuation - which is a major area this tax reform is going to.

 

[SylviaB]

You confuse having a lot of money with being productive. Fail.

Well we don't tax money that rich people have stored away or something

we tax income/capital gains etc

and to make an income you have to be supplying some demand i.e. being productive

 

[TacoTerrorist]

Yeah people here seem to be confusing production with wealth.

The super rich elite don't produce anything for fucks sakes. The people they employ do the actual producing of goods and services. The rich are like fucking parasites, feeding off the labour of the bulk of people.

I'd just like to ask why people care more about the interests of the rich than everyone else? Fuck those fucking bastards.

 

[Existential]

Yeah people here seem to be confusing production with wealth.

The super rich elite don't produce anything for fucks sakes. The people they employ do the actual producing of goods and services. The rich are like fucking parasites, feeding off the labour of the bulk of people.

I'd just like to ask why people care more about the interests of the rich than everyone else? Fuck those fucking bastards.

in any case, the tax isn't evil. it's just making the rich people of the mining industry a little less rich in order to help australians on modest incomes.

if you're against australians sharing the wealth of our country in which all of us own, than your against this mining tax.

if however, you have a sense of compassion for our ageing population and those on modest incomes, you are for this tax reform.

 

[Lentern]

Yeah people here seem to be confusing production with wealth.

The super rich elite don't produce anything for fucks sakes. The people they employ do the actual producing of goods and services. The rich are like fucking parasites, feeding off the labour of the bulk of people.

I'd just like to ask why people care more about the interests of the rich than everyone else? Fuck those fucking bastards.

A man after my own heart.

 

[Kwayera]

if however, you have a sense of compassion for our ageing population and those on modest incomes, you are for this tax reform.

What?

 

[withoutaface]

Yeah people here seem to be confusing production with wealth.

The super rich elite don't produce anything for fucks sakes. The people they employ do the actual producing of goods and services. The rich are like fucking parasites, feeding off the labour of the bulk of people.

I'd just like to ask why people care more about the interests of the rich than everyone else? Fuck those fucking bastards.

So you think those below them would be equally productive without any guidance from those in management? If so how come we don't see 'collectives' as the predominant productive force in society (given that logically a product without the overheads of huge executive bonuses would be more competitive on the marketplace)?