I agree.... 3 Unit aims for the 'deeper, deeper meaning' of texts (e.g. context, societal values, autobiographical readings of the author, critical studies, philosophical notions behind the text etc.) .... it's a very independent course which means, if you were to do it, you must engage with the prescribed texts through wider reading and thorough research.I found in EX1, there wasn't a lot of textual analysis - it was more the ideas behind the text that were of concern.
I know the feeling. There were two guys in my Advanced English class (myself included).cause of the whole "I'm the only guy in this class".... lol.
you're*Oh, another thing is that I find that the class is more of a 'discussion' rather than a normal 2 Unit English class.... I find the teacher begs for you to argue your interpretation of the text with textual evidence.... so if Your in a small class like myself - BE PREPARED TO TALK ABOUT YOUR VIEWS! It's daunting for myself cause of the whole "I'm the only guy in this class".... lol.
This is redundant. Write either 'am' or 'in the morning' not both.We just gave our EX1 teacher the silent treatment before he lectured us instead, so we didn't have to talk.
We gave the excuse, "But sir... it's 7:50am in the morning =("
It's for effect. Saying, 'am' and then 'in the morning' creates a greater and more profound effect on the reader.you're*
This is redundant. Write either 'am' or 'in the morning' not both.
I didn't say it was bad English, I said it was redundant, which it is.It's for effect. Saying, 'am' and then 'in the morning' creates a greater and more profound effect on the reader.
And if you're going to retort "Bad English" - you should go READ LAST EXIT TO BROOKLYN BY HUBERT SELBY, JR. WHO WRITES ABOUT TWO CHAPTERS JUST LIKE THIS - AND I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD CALL THAT BAD ENGLISH BECAUSE IT'S USED FOR EFFECT.
It does lose its effect in textual form though. In a speech, it would work fine, because you can have the emphasis.It would be redundant if it wasn't used for effect.
It would be redundant if it wasn't used for effect.
Told.It does lose its effect in textual form though. In a speech, it would work fine, because you can have the emphasis.
Only if they are currently prescribed, I believe.I thought you're not allowed to use other prescribed texts for a related?
You are allowed to use other prescribed texts. However, it is looked down upon by markers. As are non-current prescribed texts.Only if they are currently prescribed, I believe.