asmellyfish
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
this is so rude!
this is so rude!
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
She shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Lolsmith
- Start date
thank_dentists
Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 67
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2010
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
thats so rude..
thats so rude..
laurencelaw
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2011
- Messages
- 19
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2012
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
people should never be raped, when people used to walk around naked they weren't raped, so why does this argument have anything to do with trashy clothes? clothing is overrated.
people should never be raped, when people used to walk around naked they weren't raped, so why does this argument have anything to do with trashy clothes? clothing is overrated.
RANK 1
Active Member
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
pretty sure the alpha males procreated with anyone they fucking wanted, regardless of consent
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
Because they didnt have laws and a fucking club to the head was a giant incentive not to rape?
katie tully
ashleey luvs roosters
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred.
If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats' or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred.
RANK 1
Active Member
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
i remember that quote from somewhere, but i cant remember
kaz1
et tu
Lolsmith
kill all boomers
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
SheikYerBouti
SheikYerBouti
cheese_cheese
Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 403
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
That is a hard question which I have avocations for both sides of the argument.
That is a hard question which I have avocations for both sides of the argument.
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
This thread makes me sick.
To be completely honest, I'm not even sure that a lot of the people here aren't trolling.
REGARDLESS of what the woman is wearing, rape. is. wrong. If a man cannot comprehend this - or if his mind is not strong enough to overpower his sexual urges - or if he comprehends it but decides to disregard it - then evidently he does not function at a humane or rational enough level to be a participating member of society, and should be locked up for others' safety.
Fighting fire with fire will not help. Introduce guns into society and not only the victims will use them - so will the predators. I am tempted to apply the Harry Potter quote about "Yes, but the other side has magic too" but feel it would lower the tone of what I'm saying.
As to the al-Hilali quote, women are not meat because they have feelings so what you'd do to meat you evidently wouldn't do to a woman... and men are not cats because they have sentience and conscience. Any men who will rape a woman based on the logic of that sentence should be treated like an animal, as the analogy suggests they are, and not like a human.
Saying that feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men is astoundingly dismissive of the trauma and damage experienced by rape victims, and the fact that feminism - which campaigns for equality between men and women - is inherently morally right in and of itself, no matter what facet of that equality for which they are arguing.
I'm going to ignore stupidity about paedophilia and that women are in any way inferior to men.
This thread makes me sick.
To be completely honest, I'm not even sure that a lot of the people here aren't trolling.
REGARDLESS of what the woman is wearing, rape. is. wrong. If a man cannot comprehend this - or if his mind is not strong enough to overpower his sexual urges - or if he comprehends it but decides to disregard it - then evidently he does not function at a humane or rational enough level to be a participating member of society, and should be locked up for others' safety.
Fighting fire with fire will not help. Introduce guns into society and not only the victims will use them - so will the predators. I am tempted to apply the Harry Potter quote about "Yes, but the other side has magic too" but feel it would lower the tone of what I'm saying.
As to the al-Hilali quote, women are not meat because they have feelings so what you'd do to meat you evidently wouldn't do to a woman... and men are not cats because they have sentience and conscience. Any men who will rape a woman based on the logic of that sentence should be treated like an animal, as the analogy suggests they are, and not like a human.
Saying that feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men is astoundingly dismissive of the trauma and damage experienced by rape victims, and the fact that feminism - which campaigns for equality between men and women - is inherently morally right in and of itself, no matter what facet of that equality for which they are arguing.
I'm going to ignore stupidity about paedophilia and that women are in any way inferior to men.
Lolsmith
kill all boomers
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
why is that all these new people come in riding their unicorn of moral superiority and condemnation and then just post the same fucking shit that's already been posted
good contribution
why is that all these new people come in riding their unicorn of moral superiority and condemnation and then just post the same fucking shit that's already been posted
good contribution
Shadowdude
Cult of Personality
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,145
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2010
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
2. Did we ever push the opinion that women were pieces of meat? I think that was just placed there for discussion on what we were talking about - the effect of clothing and behaviour on instances of rape.
3. Well, don't you agree feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men? It seems to me they're just painting all men as bad.
4. Does feminism campaign for equality between men and women? Does it really?
5. Don't you agree that women are inferior to men in some aspects - such as physical strength?
1. Did we ever say rape was right?
2. Did we ever push the opinion that women were pieces of meat? I think that was just placed there for discussion on what we were talking about - the effect of clothing and behaviour on instances of rape.
3. Well, don't you agree feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men? It seems to me they're just painting all men as bad.
4. Does feminism campaign for equality between men and women? Does it really?
5. Don't you agree that women are inferior to men in some aspects - such as physical strength?
Lolsmith
kill all boomers
Shadowdude
Cult of Personality
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,145
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2010
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
LOLOLOL MANCHESTER UNITED LOST 6-1 TO MANCHESTER CITY.
Hmm...
LOLOLOL MANCHESTER UNITED LOST 6-1 TO MANCHESTER CITY.
Re: Guess she shouldn't have dressed like a slut I guess
1. Did we ever say rape was right? Some people in this thread did, yes. Anyway, did I say that was what this thread was arguing?
2. Did we ever push the opinion that women were pieces of meat? I think that was just placed there for discussion on what we were talking about - the effect of clothing and behaviour on instances of rape. Again, did I say anyone did? You say it was placed there for discussion - I discussed it. My crime was...?
3. Well, don't you agree feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men? It seems to me they're just painting all men as bad. No, I disagree. Look deeper than that. WHY would anyone want an excuse to attack men, unless they had a motivation - eg, bad treatment at the hands of a man, or inequality? Sure there are some people who hate for funsies, but not enough to fuel the entire movement that is feminism.
4. Does feminism campaign for equality between men and women? Does it really? ...yes. What do you think it's for? Oh of course there are women who campaign for a matriarchy and mistakenly call it feminism, but there are nutters in every group. I don't suggest that Christianity campaigns for the violent annihilation of foreigners and left-wingers, though there are people like Anders Breivik (sp)
5. Don't you agree that women are inferior to men in some aspects - such as physical strength? Okay, got me there. But what I was arguing against was the posts a few pages back about women's inferiority in terms of comprehension, intelligence etc. If I say all people are equal I'm not talking about their height, I'm talking about philosophy and human rights. You gotta take things in context.
(Also: re: sport: Brisbane Roar is going to DOMINATE the A-League based on their last game...)
1. Did we ever say rape was right? Some people in this thread did, yes. Anyway, did I say that was what this thread was arguing?
2. Did we ever push the opinion that women were pieces of meat? I think that was just placed there for discussion on what we were talking about - the effect of clothing and behaviour on instances of rape. Again, did I say anyone did? You say it was placed there for discussion - I discussed it. My crime was...?
3. Well, don't you agree feminists are using rape as an excuse to attack men? It seems to me they're just painting all men as bad. No, I disagree. Look deeper than that. WHY would anyone want an excuse to attack men, unless they had a motivation - eg, bad treatment at the hands of a man, or inequality? Sure there are some people who hate for funsies, but not enough to fuel the entire movement that is feminism.
4. Does feminism campaign for equality between men and women? Does it really? ...yes. What do you think it's for? Oh of course there are women who campaign for a matriarchy and mistakenly call it feminism, but there are nutters in every group. I don't suggest that Christianity campaigns for the violent annihilation of foreigners and left-wingers, though there are people like Anders Breivik (sp)
5. Don't you agree that women are inferior to men in some aspects - such as physical strength? Okay, got me there. But what I was arguing against was the posts a few pages back about women's inferiority in terms of comprehension, intelligence etc. If I say all people are equal I'm not talking about their height, I'm talking about philosophy and human rights. You gotta take things in context.
Probably because the thread goes on for twenty-six bloody pages and nobody wants to read that much repetitive bile so they just throw in their two cents and leave. Self-perpetuating cycle. Anyway, time to study for that little thing, the HSC. Farewell peeps.
(Also: re: sport: Brisbane Roar is going to DOMINATE the A-League based on their last game...)
Last edited: