Yes, with reference to one contemporary issueDid the sovereignty question ask for reference to an issue?
I too defined it but I thought mainly issues of state sovereignty were more a detriment or hindrance in enforcing rights because you cannot impose a treaty on another country - and it makes it difficult to enforce such treaties and international conventions (mine were to do with child soldiers) as a country cannot go and "invade" another country. Because of state sovereignty, it is difficult to prosecute and even arrest international criminals - but I conclude by saying that these problems in enforcing human rights associated with child soldiers are overcome by international collaboration of states "Paris Peace Principles"This was my structure for tackling the question.
- Introduce issue ... extent of issue... ( human trafficking and slavery )
- Define state sovereignty - ultimate law making power of a state its ability to govern its own internal affairs without outside interference and their ability to make laws governing their country
- Talked about how this is important to ensure compliance with international treaties and the ratification of international treaties
- UN Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons especially women and children - which is signed by most of the sovereign states
- Australia's ratification of the protocol and it's 'sovereign' ability to incorporate it into domestic law
- R-V-Wei Tang 2008 - talked about how Australia governs its own internal affairs with abuse of human slaves under the commonwealth 270 division of code and how she was charged to 10 years on 5 counts of possessing slaves and 5 counts of limiting their movement
- Concluding statement
That was my answer step by step
Sorry for being late. Well sovereignty can be explained from different angles. The approach I took was "ultimate law making power of a state" that was my general conscience in answering the question as I explained how sovereign countries tackled the issue domestically and I also tried talking about how they try and get other countries with this problem to make laws regarding their country in tackling the issue .. i.e. UN protocol to suppress, punish and stop trafficking in persons especially women and childrenI too defined it but I thought mainly issues of state sovereignty were more a detriment or hindrance in enforcing rights because you cannot impose a treaty on another country - and it makes it difficult to enforce such treaties and international conventions (mine were to do with child soldiers) as a country cannot go and "invade" another country. Because of state sovereignty, it is difficult to prosecute and even arrest international criminals - but I conclude by saying that these problems in enforcing human rights associated with child soldiers are overcome by international collaboration of states "Paris Peace Principles"
I guess maybe its different depending on contemporary issue. Mine was Child Soldiers so I think it was wise to mainly focus on state sovereignty as a key obstacle in enforcing HR
Thoughts?