• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

free UMAT questions (1 Viewer)

mahli

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
43
Location
Northern NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
I'm almost certain the answer to question 2 is D, because of several reasons. Firstly, the UMAT doesn't require any prerequisite medical knowledge as far as I know, and thus you're not expected to understand the severity (or lack of) of the disease the baby may potentially be born with. This, alongside the fact that the medical staff have performed all necessary actions to warn the parents, rules out C (hopeless) as an answer. Therefore, the answer must be D. This is because the counsellor is required to perform the final notification, however the patient unknowing of this requirement then assumes the counsellor's actions to be personally motivated, and lashes out, unnecessarily judging the counsellor. The paragraph ends with the patients judgement of the medical staff, and there is no evidence to support the 'hopeless' answer. At least that was my reasoning?
 

Sainteced

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
109
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2015
what is the profit incentiveeeeeee
The amount of tax determines whether a venture is profitable or not, so it depends on the percentage of tax on the profits from mining.

I'm almost certain the answer to question 2 is D, because of several reasons. Firstly, the UMAT doesn't require any prerequisite medical knowledge as far as I know, and thus you're not expected to understand the severity (or lack of) of the disease the baby may potentially be born with. This, alongside the fact that the medical staff have performed all necessary actions to warn the parents, rules out C (hopeless) as an answer. Therefore, the answer must be D. This is because the counsellor is required to perform the final notification, however the patient unknowing of this requirement then assumes the counsellor's actions to be personally motivated, and lashes out, unnecessarily judging the counsellor. The paragraph ends with the patients judgement of the medical staff, and there is no evidence to support the 'hopeless' answer. At least that was my reasoning?
That is good reasoning, maybe separate your lines of reasoning so they are easier to read. But otherwise you are spot on =)

Hey guys I have moved the thread to: http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=274732&p=5688671#post5688671

The answers for the first question are up there and the new questions are up, so just go there! =)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top