so a little harm is okay
a little stealing from legitimate copyright holders is okay
a little ss-totenkopfverbande is okay
But they aren't really ~stealing~ it. They don't take their intellectual property or copyrighted material and then claim it as their own or turn a profit from it
so what's your real objection to copyright owners controlling access to their products. is the only reason SOPA and PIPA are bad is because the gubermint is doing it?
It's an issue of practicality. Like you said, there's no way people can't access "banned" material that is available elsewhere on the web and it will cut down the ability for future individuals to build something fantastic like YouTube and Facebook. If my understanding is correct, there is even room for exploitation of this legislation for larger firms to sabotage growing threats but that is getting a bit towards the fringe.
Whilst I have a strong aversion to the state, the reason being so, again, is an issue of practicality. The state is on the most part an inefficient and unjust operator of anything and often worsens things. There have been state successes and I recognise that, but the numerous failures outweigh and overshadow the success. I would love to see the government run like a real business and make profit for its citizenry without the need to take more money from them.