• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Inequality. (1 Viewer)

Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
I'm not going to prove the basic results (AM>= GM) but here it is:

 
Last edited:

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I had a rather different approach, but good solution!

We are given that:

 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Asianese, your solution doesn't quite work. There are a few inequality signs the wrong way around which ruin your idea for proving the inequality. It can be fixed but the entire second half of your argument will look different.

Good solution carrotsticks, essentially the same as mine.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Hmm I think I see it...it's where I subbed in But I subbed a into a didn't I? I will re do it later.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Hmm...I can't seem to get it to work using AM>= GM and other results. Is the cyclic factorisation the only way? (Probably not?)
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
No, AM-GM is the only essential step really. Spotting a neat factorisation isn't entirely necessary, althought it makes the solution look nicer. One could also do the question like this, just using AM-GM and grouping suitable terms together:

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top