• YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Advice on the treatment of these dotpoints (1 Viewer)

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
"Analyse information from secondary sources to summarise the industrial origins of sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen and evaluate reasons for concern about their release into the environment"

- This asks us to "evaluate" the reasons for concern, so are we meant to make a judgement as to whether the reasons are valid or not? The textbook just elaborates on the reasons and makes no judgement whatsoever

"Assess the evidence which indicates increases in atmospheric concentration of oxides of sulfur and nitrogen"

- Again, are we meant to judge the evidence showing increases in SOx and NOx concentrations?
 

Spiritual Being

hehehehehe
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
3,054
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2018
Assess the evidence which indicates increases in atmospheric concentration of oxides of sulfur and nitrogen:
– The gases NO and NO2 are collectively referred to as NOx.
– It is difficult to quantitatively state that oxides of sulfur and nitrogen have been increasing in the atmosphere because these oxides occur in relatively low concentrations, such as 0.01 ppm (parts per million).
– Chemical instruments able to measure very low concentrations, like those for SO2, have only been commercially available since the 1970s, so there is no reliable data for these gases before this time.
– HOWEVER, analysis of gas found in ice-core samples excavated from Antarctica shows that levels of N2O in the atmosphere has increased by about 10%.
– It can also be stated that the increased burning of fossil fuels after the Industrial Revolution did indeed lead to a rise in oxides of sulfur; evidence for this is that the air quality of major industrial cities, such as London, deteriorated greatly.
– NO2 leads to the formation of photochemical smog, a direct indicator of excessive levels of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere.
– In 1952, the so called “Great Smog of December” killed some 4000 people, mainly the frail and elderly, due to the effects of sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the air.
– The increase of the incidence of acid rain also points to the increase in atmospheric concentrations of SO2 and NOx compounds.
– Acid rain forms when atmospheric water reacts with these compounds; hence an increase in acid rain points to an increase in these compounds.
– Using chemical instruments in recent times, it has been measured that global atmospheric concentrations of these oxides is not increasing greatly over long periods of time, but simply peaks every now and then.





Analyse information from secondary sources to summarise the industrial origins of sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen and evaluate reasons for concern about their release into the environment:
– See ABOVE for industrial sources of sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen.
– Reasons for CONCERN about these Oxides:
– Acid Rain: Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide are acidic oxides that react with water in the atmosphere to form acids:
– SO2 (g) + H2O (l) H2SO3 (aq) (sulfurous acid)
– 2NO2 (g) + H2O (l) HNO3 (aq) + HNO2 (aq) (nitric and nitrous acid)
These acids then combine with rain droplets, forming acid rain. Acid rain is very destructive; it can decimate entire forests, corrode limestone structures and disrupt natural ecosystems by altering natural pH levels.
– Health Problems: Sulfur dioxide is a severe respiratory irritant and can cause breathing difficulties at concentrations as low as 1 ppm. It triggers asthma attacks and aggravates emphysema. Nitrogen dioxide is also a respiratory irritant. At concentrations above 3 ppm, it can begin to destroy tissue, as it forms the strong acid, nitric acid.
– Photochemical Smog: NO2 causes the formation of smog. This is a form of air pollution in which sunlight reacts nitrogen dioxide, hydrocarbons and oxygen to form ozone, PAN (peroxyacylnitrates) and haze. It greatly affects visibility, while ozone has harmful effects at concentrations as low as 0.1 ppm.
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Thanks HEAPS for this!!! :))) I hope it rains cookies at your place tonight
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Assess the evidence which indicates increases in atmospheric concentration of oxides of sulfur and nitrogen:
– The gases NO and NO2 are collectively referred to as NOx.
– It is difficult to quantitatively state that oxides of sulfur and nitrogen have been increasing in the atmosphere because these oxides occur in relatively low concentrations, such as 0.01 ppm (parts per million).
– Chemical instruments able to measure very low concentrations, like those for SO2, have only been commercially available since the 1960s, so there is no reliable data for these gases before this time.
– HOWEVER, analysis of gas found in ice-core samples excavated from Antarctica shows that levels of NO2 in the atmosphere has increased by about 10% but it is found that as these oxides are highly soluble, they can dissolve in the ice and fume out, lowering the concentration found in the ice sample.
– It can also be stated that the increased burning of fossil fuels after the Industrial Revolution did indeed lead to a rise in oxides of sulfur; evidence for this is that the air quality of major industrial cities, such as London, deteriorated greatly due to the presence of these oxides.
– NO2 leads to the formation of photochemical smog, a direct indicator of excessive levels of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere. Smog is a problem in many ways, it reduces visibility as well as act as an irritant to the eyes and respiratory system.
– In 1952, the so called “Great Smog of London” in 1952 killed some 4000 people, mainly the frail and elderly, due to the effects of sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the air.
– The increase of the incidence of acid rain also points to the increase in atmospheric concentrations of SO2 and NOx compounds as these are acidic oxides.
– Acid rain forms when atmospheric water reacts with these compounds; hence an increase in acid rain points to an increase in concentration of these compounds.
2NO+O2-->2NO2
2NO2+H2O-->HNO3+HNO2

SO2+H2O-->H2SO3
2SO2+O2-->2SO3
SO3+H2O-->H2SO4
– Using chemical instruments in recent times, it has been measured that global atmospheric concentrations of these oxides is not increasing greatly over long periods of time, but simply peaks every now and then.
Evidently, there is an abundance of evidence that strongly suggests that the concentrations of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur are present however most evidence is indirect and the only direct evidence for their increase by measurements was available from the 1960s and thus, it can only be known for certain that their concentrations have increased since the 1960s. It is likely that the concentrations have increased since the Industrial Revolution but that still remains an area of further study.
If you receive a question on this, make sure you answer it properly with a real JUDGEMENT and more detail in your points. Furthermore, the verb requires advantages/disadvantages and so, you might want to discuss 2-3 points about how it is useful or how it is invalid etc.
 
Last edited:

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Chemistry Questions

1. When a soft drink is decarbonated, would the pH of the soft drink increase because the opening of the soft drink can allows CO2 to escape and this makes the eq. shift left? Would the increased pH be a result of the equlibrium shifting left and the hydrogen ion concentration decreasing due to more hydrogen ions being used up in the reverse reaction?


CO2 (g) + H2O(l) <-----> H+(aq) + HCO3-
 

Galapagos

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
302
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: Soft drink decarbonation - couple of questions

sounds about right.

co2 will escape, system will attempt to re-adjust by shifting left however it is no longer a closed system so equilibrium will not be re-established and thus [hydrogen ion] will decrease, subsequently increasing pH.
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Re: Soft drink decarbonation - couple of questions

Its plausible for the way you have explained it, but i do recall there was another reason for the shift to the left when it is opened and i think it was from the change in pressure towards the system. I could be wrong but i do recall it being because it's based on the solubility of the CO2 in H2O, meaning that its more favorable to release the gas than to retain it when the pressure is basically decreased
 

Galapagos

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
302
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: Soft drink decarbonation - couple of questions

Yes, by opening a bottle of soft drink you decrease the pressure, and so more and more co2 is converted from (aq) to (g) to try and overcome this change. This explains why the gas will escape and the soft drink will become flat, which, as mentioned, will cause [H+] to decrease. I think this helps to explain it a bit better:

CO2(g) + H2O (l) <---> CO2(aq) + H2O(l)<---> H+(aq) + HCO3-(aq)
 

golgo13

Alchemist
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
304
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Re: Soft drink decarbonation - couple of questions

I just think you guys are pushing it a bit with the idea of the second conversion to the acid, not saying it is wrong, but i think it's pushing beyond what the HSC requires
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Would the net ionic equation for this reaction be identical to the 'normal' reaction?

NH3(aq) + CH3COOH(aq) --> NH4CH3COO(aq)

I can't split up acetic acid into its separate ionic specimens as it's weak, but what about ammonium acetate? I'm guessing it's soluble in water, so should I split it up into its separate species?
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: Would the net ionic equation for this reaction be identical to the 'normal' react

So, would this be the net ionic equation?

NH3(aq) + CH3COOH(aq) --> NH4+(aq) + CH3COO-(aq)
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: Would the net ionic equation for this reaction be identical to the 'normal' react

bump
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Re: Would the net ionic equation for this reaction be identical to the 'normal' react

I think you do split it as:
NH3 + CH3COO- + H+ --> NH4+ + CH3COO-

Net Ionic: NH3 + H+ --> NH4+
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
What is the proper name for this piece of equipment?

Don't know if it's called a pipette or not (because I think pipettes are generally associated with the accurate glassware variety, not the plastic eyedropper type), but what are those eyedropper that you use to draw solutions for transferring between beakers called? Eyedroppers? Eyedropper pipettes?

They're plastic, flexible and look like upside-down thermometers.
 

starshine02

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
436
Location
Newfoundland
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Re: What is the proper name for this piece of equipment?

Are you talking about a Pasteur pipette?
 

Johnstan

Sickunt overload
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
168
Location
Compton
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Uni Grad
2012
Re: What is the proper name for this piece of equipment?

dildo
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: What is the proper name for this piece of equipment?

Ahh, thanks then :)
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
How do you put this into words?

So how would you say C=O in words? I want l that the carbon-oxygen bond, but doesn't that refer to C-O, and not C=O?

Or can carbon-oxygen refer to both C-O and C=O?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top