MedVision ad

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

YEp something like that, nice work.
I tried out the t-method as suggested but did not end up with a nice expression. Maybe I made a mistake along the way. But we can integrate without the t-method this way:



if you prefer.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Let a < b be two consecutive roots of a polynomial P(x), (so P is nonzero between a and b). Suppose these roots are each of multiplicity 1, so that:

P(x)=(x-a)(x-b)g(x)

for some polynomial g(x) with g(a),g(b) != 0 by the factor theorem.

1. Prove that g(a) and g(b) have the same sign.

2. Prove there is a real number c between a and b with f'(c)=0.

3. Prove that (2) is true even if we drop the assumption that the roots a and b are of multiplicity 1.

4. Draw a picture and give a geometric description of this result.

(This is a special case of the Mean Value theorem, one of the most important theorems in differential calculus. The general proof of the MVT is beyond the scope of MX2, but we know enough about polynomials to be able to prove this special case.)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon











 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Let a < b be two consecutive roots of a polynomial P(x), (so P is nonzero between a and b). Suppose these roots are each of multiplicity 1, so that:

P(x)=(x-a)(x-b)g(x)

for some polynomial g(x) with g(a),g(b) != 0 by the factor theorem.

1. Prove that g(a) and g(b) have the same sign.

2. Prove there is a real number c between a and b with f'(c)=0.

3. Prove that (2) is true even if we drop the assumption that the roots a and b are of multiplicity 1.

4. Draw a picture and give a geometric description of this result.

(This is a special case of the Mean Value theorem, one of the most important theorems in differential calculus. The general proof of the MVT is beyond the scope of MX2, but we know enough about polynomials to be able to prove this special case.)
1.



If a and b are consecutive roots, then it is easy to see that P'(a) and P'(b) are opposite in sign by drawing a picture. They can't be zero since they have roots of multiplicity of 1.





Since a < b, let us denote a sign (positive or negative) as (1) and the other as (2)

So IF P'(a) has sign (1), and since P'(a) = (a-b) g(a), since a < b then g(a) has sign (2)
Since P'(b) is opposite in sign, it will have sign (2)

IF P'(b) has sign (2), since b-a > 0, then g(b) has sign (2)

Therefore g(a) and g(b) have the same sign.

2.

(I assume you mean P'(c) = 0 )

Since P'(a) and P'(b) have OPPOSITE gradient, therefore there must exist a point (since P is a polynomial and is therefore continuous) that P'(c) is zero.

3.

IF the multiplicity of a and/or b are greater than 1, then the P'(a) and/or P'(b) are zero. But that doesn't matter since for some value, P'(a+) (some value to the right of a), will either be positive or negative, therefore the polynomial is either increasing or decreasing.
No matter what the orientation, the curve must curve back to zero as b is a root as well. Since it must curve back there must exist some point where the curve has zero gradient. (easier explained by a picture).

4.

*coming soon*

======
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

1.



If a and b are consecutive roots, then it is easy to see that P'(a) and P'(b) are opposite in sign by drawing a picture. They can't be zero since they have roots of multiplicity of 1.





Since a < b, let us denote a sign (positive or negative) as (1) and the other as (2)

So IF P'(a) has sign (1), and since P'(a) = (a-b) g(a), since a < b then g(a) has sign (2)
Since P'(b) is opposite in sign, it will have sign (2)

IF P'(b) has sign (2), since b-a > 0, then g(b) has sign (2)

Therefore g(a) and g(b) have the same sign.

2.

(I assume you mean P'(c) = 0 )

Since P'(a) and P'(b) have OPPOSITE gradient, therefore there must exist a point (since P is a polynomial and is therefore continuous) that P'(c) is zero.

3.

IF the multiplicity of a and/or b are greater than 1, then the P'(a) and/or P'(b) are zero. But that doesn't matter since for some value, P'(a+) (some value to the right of a), will either be positive or negative, therefore the polynomial is either increasing or decreasing.
No matter what the orientation, the curve must curve back to zero as b is a root as well. Since it must curve back there must exist some point where the curve has zero gradient. (easier explained by a picture).

4.

*coming soon*

======
Good, although your answer to 3. is more of a plausibility argument than a proof. The point is to do it in a similar way to to 2, using that a continuous function can only change sign on an interval if it possesses a root on this interval.
 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I tried out the t-method as suggested but did not end up with a nice expression. Maybe I made a mistake along the way. But we can integrate without the t-method this way:



if you prefer.
wow! very nice! thank u for sharing :)
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Am interested in seeing peoples solutions actually. This is a v.good question because it is not very technically demanding at all, but if you don't properly understand the relevant part of the MX2 course you probably won't have any chance of solving it. ie it slay rote learners.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

You'd also have to note the polynomial is not monic. Though I guess this is a consequence of being a root.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

You'd also have to note the polynomial is not monic. Though I guess this is a consequence of being a root.
Huh? The result is still true for monic polynomials...and having a root of the form p+q^{1/2} is perfectly possible for monic polynomials.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Huh? The result is still true for monic polynomials...and having a root of the form p+q^{1/2} is perfectly possible for monic polynomials.
Nevermind I derped and thought the root was rational after reading "p and q are rational" without considering the square root.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top