MedVision ad

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Nice work, it can also be done by considering the geometric series:



Substituting cis theta, equating real parts for a series in cosine. Then integrating with bounds alpha and pi yields the LHS and the RHS plus a limit to infinity of an integral which one must prove converges to zero.




Ah alright, is that not a definition of an algebraic number? To be a root of a rational polynomial?

Also your method is very clever.
Yes but the existence and uniqueness of a MINIMAL polynomial is not immediately clear and must be proven. And thanks :).
 
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
110
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Using the result from the previous question:



Integrating both sides from pi to 2, and using the double angle rule, the result from the Basel problem and so on, we arrive at:



Then noticing that

We can notice that the LHS of what I have right now, is the LHS of the question - 1 (since at k=0 the function approaches 1). This then cancels out the term on the RHS, therefore leaving it with:





I know that it should evaluate to zero, however the same problem from when I encountered trying the Basel problem comes up where I cannot justify interchanging the theta integral and the limit to infinity as the alpha integral converges to zero due to by parts. However I cannot justify putting it in there unfortunately :/
Nice work but I don't know how we can prove that the limit goes to 0. There is a more rigorous method to prove this, will post it sometime next week.
I found this question in a book called .
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

It becomes:



And I don't know how to do that :/
Telescoping, pairing, binomial theorem don't seem to work

Possibly a combinatoric proof?
I suck at those but yeah

EDIT:

Considering the cards of numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... , m, .... , n on the table.
We must pick k cards from the n on the table.

The probability that we pick these k cards from the first m is



So summing these probabilities will give us the LHS.

Now is there a nice way of doing this probability a different way to yield the RHS?
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

It becomes:



And I don't know how to do that :/
Telescoping, pairing, binomial theorem don't seem to work

Possibly a combinatoric proof?
I suck at those but yeah

EDIT:

Considering the cards of numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, ... , m, .... , n on the table.
We must pick k cards from the n on the table.

The probability that we pick these k cards from the first m is



So summing these probabilities will give us the LHS.

Now is there a nice way of doing this probability a different way to yield the RHS?
What if

Although I think the question should state that otherwise it won't work.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

What if

Although I think the question should state that otherwise it won't work.
Well yeah if m > n then we arrive at negative factorials so it should be discounted.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Well yeah if m > n then we arrive at negative factorials so it should be discounted.
The RHS is equal to (n+1)P(m) / (n)P(m) (idk how to do permutations in latex)

maybe you can choose the cards in this way some how.

Which is equal to:

 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

The RHS is equal to (n+1)P(m) / (n)P(m) (idk how to do permutations in latex)

maybe you can choose the cards in this way some how.

Which is equal to:

Nice observation.

So that can mean that when counting the probability the different all the cards needs to be on the table at once. And we need to find the probability of selecting the cards in that fashion among the m sets of (1,2,...,n) cards in one go (because there is only one fraction).

And for permutation, I guess you can do:

 

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

1) [(1/a)-(1/b)]^2 + [(1/a)-(1/c)]^2 + [(1/b)-(1/c)]^2 >=0 (equality occurs iff a=b=c)
2/a^2 + 2/b^2 + 2/c^2 -2[(1/ab)+(1/bc)+(1/ac)] >=0
=> (1/a)^2 + (1/b)^2 + (1/c)^2 >= 1/bc + 1/ac + 1/ab for all real a,b,c=/=0 (*)
Hence, bc/a + ac/b + ab/c = abc[(1/a^2)+(1/b^2) +(1/c^2)]>=abc[(1/ab)+(1/bc)+(1/ac)]=a+b+c as req.
2) Refer back to (*), replace a with sqrt(a), b with sqrt(b) and c with sqrt(c) and the second inequality immediately falls out for a,b,c>0

Sorry if it's hard to read, still haven't learnt latex.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon







Its integration but its more about series than anything.
 
Last edited:

shongaponga

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
125
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

1) [(1/a)-(1/b)]^2 + [(1/a)-(1/c)]^2 + [(1/b)-(1/c)]^2 >=0 (equality occurs iff a=b=c)
2/a^2 + 2/b^2 + 2/c^2 -2[(1/ab)+(1/bc)+(1/ac)] >=0
=> (1/a)^2 + (1/b)^2 + (1/c)^2 >= 1/bc + 1/ac + 1/ab for all real a,b,c=/=0 (*)
Hence, bc/a + ac/b + ab/c = abc[(1/a^2)+(1/b^2) +(1/c^2)]>=abc[(1/ab)+(1/bc)+(1/ac)]=a+b+c as req.
2) Refer back to (*), replace a with sqrt(a), b with sqrt(b) and c with sqrt(c) and the second inequality immediately falls out for a,b,c>0

Sorry if it's hard to read, still haven't learnt latex.
http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php Use this website, then simply copy and paste the code generated and wrap it around [ tex ] "CODE" [ / tex ] (without the spaces).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top