Not necessarily this.yep you need to have very logical and concise writing to get good marks for anything worth 3 or more marks. hsc markers have been known to take off marks for 5+ mark Q's if your structure is bad or writing doesnt have a nice flow. even if you have all the content in there...
well i lost a mark once because i wrote 2 pages for a 5 marker might just be my school though... anyways concise writing helpsNot necessarily this.
I pretty much wrote a page for a 3 marker in the HSC.well i lost a mark once because i wrote 2 pages for a 5 marker might just be my school though... anyways concise writing helps
i know but sometimes they dont like it if you ramble onI pretty much wrote a page for a 3 marker in the HSC.
Got all 3 marks. lol
I'm not sure if I have ever heard "concise" but I have heard coherent and logical progression which is in most 5+ markers.Being concise helps but not necessary depends on the criteria they use, some marking criteria has that from 4-5 for being concise others might not hahahaha
I know for a fact the term concise was used in the marking scheme for 2011 and 2012 HSC Physics, interestingly, both in the extended response for the Age of Silicon option.I'm not sure if I have ever heard "concise" but I have heard coherent and logical progression which is in most 5+ markers.
That's probably why I haven't seen it before. Also, several state rankers have said that they wrote a lot - that's a bit subjective but you can always ask them and they often say that they went over the lines.I know for a fact the term concise was used in the marking scheme for 2011 and 2012 HSC Physics, interestingly, both in the extended response for the Age of Silicon option.
Most of the time it is 'demonstrates coherence and logical progession'
I would argue that concise and coherent are two different things.Marker discretion, but some believe being coherent is being concise in a sense. Some students may try to do a hit and miss, where they kinda brute force the question write everything they know, this is sort of to counter them which instead of getting a 5 you get a 4, because you still had the content but you weren't being coherent (concise), if that makes sense from where i'm coming from?
Well, obviously being concise is better if possible and it lose information. There is no doubt about that but the discussion was about harshness of marking and if you need to be concise.It is arguable i don't doubt that however, i'm just talking from experience, i was marked in a way when i did the HSC that more isn't better like there are instances you could get the same mark as someone who wrote a paragraph to your page. It's just that if you can be concise do it, at the end of the day it becomes quite subjective even when the criteria tries to eliminate that, some can write lots which are band 6 responses but some are writing pages at a band 4 response, and when you're marking thousands of them, they start to appear the same is where i'm getting at.
pretty hard imo. Ironically, I got a higher raw mark in the HSC than in any assessment I did. I think it depends on the school. My school marked very hard (i.e highest mark 80%~ and avg round 48%)Just how hard is the HSC Chemistry paper marked every year? Is it much harder than all the schools? Thanks