iBibah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,374
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2013
Maybe flying unicorns do exist...Internal contradictions are fun
Maybe flying unicorns do exist...Internal contradictions are fun
dat logicI think it all comes down to the fact that humans created faith, religion and god, to either control or have power over others or give them morals and a way of life. Also it irritates me when Catholics or Christians tell you to not take the bible literary, isn't that the whole outline of their religion? Also the bible has some very sexist, unmoral and just simply wrong teachings in it, and Christians keep contradicting themselves so much. For example "we are all equal", but "men were created first....".
I can't really speak for other religions, since i grew up in a christian family and attend a Catholic School I know quite A LOT about the Bible. (and have a lot of frustration and negative feeling towards it) lol
Anyway, i have not heard a single valid argument or a reason why people believe there's God. (maybe i'm missing the point of life)
What is moral and right to a Christian, may be immoral and wrong to her. Morality is a fickle thing.dat logic
yeh i know i just thought it was funny that she said god and religion are created to give morals and a way of life, and then she used her own morals and way of life to justify the negatives of christianityWhat is moral and right to a Christian, may be immoral and wrong to her.
this is very much a matter of opinionMorality is a fickle thing.
Ghosts do exist ...Maybe flying unicorns do exist...
Yes.Ghosts do exist ...
Most written texts are influenced by their contexts. As the monarchy was an important aspect of Shakespeare's time and location, many of his play's contain puffery aimed at kings or queens. Similarly, much of the new testament was written in a time and location where women had little rights. This accounts for the "sexist" aspect of the bible. Furthermore, the bible is filled with parables and poetry thats purpose is not to be taken literally, but for people to extrapolate certain morals or ethics from it. Hence, many "Catholics or Christians" suggest the bible is not to be taken literally.I think it all comes down to the fact that humans created faith, religion and god, to either control or have power over others or give them morals and a way of life. Also it irritates me when Catholics or Christians tell you to not take the bible literary, isn't that the whole outline of their religion? Also the bible has some very sexist, unmoral and just simply wrong teachings in it, and Christians keep contradicting themselves so much. For example "we are all equal", but "men were created first....".
I can't really speak for other religions, since i grew up in a christian family and attend a Catholic School I know quite A LOT about the Bible. (and have a lot of frustration and negative feeling towards it) lol
Anyway, i have not heard a single valid argument or a reason why people believe there's God. (maybe i'm missing the point of life)
That's pretty shit then, you have a religion that's based on your own interpretation of it...Most written texts are influenced by their contexts. As the monarchy was an important aspect of Shakespeare's time and location, many of his play's contain puffery aimed at kings or queens. Similarly, much of the new testament was written in a time and location where women had little rights. This accounts for the "sexist" aspect of the bible. Furthermore, the bible is filled with parables and poetry thats purpose is not to be taken literally, but for people to extrapolate certain morals or ethics from it. Hence, many "Catholics or Christians" suggest the bible is not to be taken literally.
With that said, I think we should be critical of everything to a fair extent. We're critical of our own work, why aren't we critical of religion?This is a pointless argument. Regardless of whether god does or does not exist, people have their own opinions and beliefs which should be respected.
Why is this a negative thing? Would you prefer them to follow the hard and fast principles of the Old Testament and commit murder and cruelty on a regular basis or apply modern values intermingled with the positive aspects of Christianity and/or Catholicism?That's pretty shit then, you have a religion that's based on your own interpretation of it...
As evidenced by this thread and the copious amounts of similar ones relating to it, there is no absence of criticism for religion in this country.With that said, I think we should be critical of everything to a fair extent. We're critical of our own work, why aren't we critical of religion?
Just because it's religion, doesn't mean we exclude it from criticism.
Christians - 1if god exists explain microwaves
No you follow a religion that has its own interpretation of the bible.That's pretty shit then, you have a religion that's based on your own interpretation of it...
Perhaps fickle was the wrong word to use. But you agree that morality does differ on all scales, I.E. person to person, region to region, across space and time. The moral consensus on many issues in the western world has without a doubt changed dramatically over the past 100 years. Leads me to wonder what the mindset will be in the next 50 years, when our generation are considered as old conservative dinosaurs holding back ‘progress’.this is very much a matter of opinion
I voted for this a long, long time ago.No you follow a religion that has its own interpretation of the bible.
And I'm actually curious, why did you say yes in the poll if you say God doesn't exist?
Still can't quite figure out if this is meant to be serious.
Worst image ever made - extremely biased and contains incorrect information to an extremely extent.
m8, it's a joke.Worst image ever made - extremely biased and contains incorrect information to an extremely extent.
1. Einstein wasn't a theist - he described himself as agnostic. In fact, Einstein thought that the idea of a personal god was childish.
2. Hitler was never an atheist - there's no proper evidence that even hints at him being atheist. In fact, he was a theist for most of his life.
3. It is true that Stalin was an atheist but trying to link what he did to atheism simply provides evidence for your scientific illiteracy - correlation does NOT imply causation. Enough said.
4. Napoleon Bonaparte is considered as one of the best military leaders of all time.
5. Ronald Reagan is the best US president? What about Abraham Lincoln?
I don't understand why you keep saying "best" for so many things for theists but none of that for atheists.