HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Sy123 · Oct 3, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{\cos (kx)}{\cos^k x}$

JJ345 · Oct 4, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sy123 said:
$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{\cos (kx)}{\cos^k x}$

Do we have to use Euler's method and compare real part etc. or is there a MX2 way to do it ?

Sy123 · Oct 4, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

JJ345 said:
Do we have to use Euler's method and compare real part etc. or is there a MX2 way to do it ?

What do you mean by euler's method?

there is a MX2 way of doing it

JJ345 · Oct 4, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sy123 said:
What do you mean by euler's method?

there is a MX2 way of doing it

Euler's Formula sorry, applying
e^{iy}=cos y+isin y
But if you didn't think of it, I probably did something retarded...

Sy123 · Oct 4, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

JJ345 said:
Euler's Formula sorry
e^{iy}=cos y+sin y
But if you didn't think of it, I probably did something retarded...

Well the HSC method would be very similar to it, in your method, just change every e^(iy) into cos y + i sin y, and it will still work out with De Moivere's

seanieg89 · Oct 5, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$Suppose $p(x)$ is a polynomial with rational coefficients such that whenever $p(x)$ is rational, $x$ is rational. What possible degrees can $p$ have?$

Sy123 · Oct 6, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$f(x) \ \ $is an increasing function over all x reals$ \ \ f(2013) = 2013$

$Describe the graph of$

$g(x) = \frac{af(x) +b}{cf(x) + d} \ \ $for$ \ \ ad = bc$

gustavo28 · Oct 7, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

seanieg89 said:
$Suppose $p(x)$ is a polynomial with rational coefficients such that whenever $p(x)$ is rational, $x$ is rational. What possible degrees can $p$ have?$

$$Call a polynomial $P(x)$ good if it satisfies the conditions in the question. So, if $P(x)$ is good, then $aP(x)+b$ where $a,c$ is rational will also be good. Moreover, if $P(a)=0$, then a must be rational. So, all of the roots of a good polynomial must also be rational. Now, from what I can see, you probably need to use the rational root theorem or some variant to solve this problem. The theorem states that if an integer polynomial P has a rational root $p/q$ where $gcd(p,q)=1$, then p divides the constant coefficient and q divides the leading coefficient. You can prove this fairly quickly (we did this in class as an example once) but it involves a little bit of number theory. Now, all linear polynomials with rational coefficients are good so we'll move on to polynomials with degree greater than 1. Suppose there is a good polynomial P with degree greater than 1 that is good.$

gustavo28 · Oct 7, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

seanieg89 said:
$Suppose $p(x)$ is a polynomial with rational coefficients such that whenever $p(x)$ is rational, $x$ is rational. What possible degrees can $p$ have?$

Multiply it by a sufficiently large integer to make it an integer polynomial Q(x) which is also good. Let the leading coefficient of Q be A and the constant be C. Now, considering the graph of Q(x)-C, we can make a prime p large enough so that Q(x)+p-c is above the x-axis for -1<=x<=1. We can also make p a prime that does not divide A. So, let such a prime be called q. Now, Q(x)+q-C where q is prime is also good and hence has only rational roots. Its constant term is q. Consider a root of this polynomial c/d. So, d divides A and, since q does not divide A, q doesn't divide d. However, c divides q. So, c=1 or c=q. If c=1, then -1<=c/d<=1 which is a contradiction since Q(x)+q-c is above the x-axis for such values of x. So, c=q.

Hence, the product of the roots is equal to q^n/stuff where stuff is an integer with no factors of q in it and n is the degree of Q. This is equal to q/A or -q/A. So, q^(n-1)*A=stuff but since n>1, q divides an integer with no factors of q in it.

Contradiction. SO the only good polynomials are linear.

Sy123 · Oct 7, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$A function can be expressed as$

$f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}x^n$

$$Where$ \ \ f^{(n)} (x) = \frac{d^n}{dx^n} f(x) \ \ f^{(0)}(x) = f(x)$

$Express$ \ \ e^x \sin x \ \ $in this form$

Sy123 · Oct 8, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$$Prove that for positive integers$ \ \ n$

$\left(\frac{n+1}{2} \right)^n \geq n!$

$You may not use the inequality$

$\sum a_k \geq \left( \prod a_k \right)^{1/k}$

Sy123 · Oct 10, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$i) A line segment of radius$ \ \ r \ \ $is rotated about the fixed origin by a small angle$

$\delta \theta \ \ $sweeps out an area of$ \ \ \delta A \ \ \ $Show that$$

$\delta A = \frac{1}{2} r^2 \delta \theta$

$ii) Hence show that for some curve with the distance of a variable point on$

$$this curve to the origin is defined by the function$ \ \ r(\theta)$

$The area sweeped out from$ \ \ y=0 \ \ $to$ \ \ y=x\tan \alpha \ \ $is given by$

$A = \int_0^{\alpha} \frac{1}{2}r^2 \ d\theta$

$$iii) For the plane curve$ \ \ x^{2/3} + y^{2/3} = a^{2/3} \ \ $the line$ \ \ y=\frac{x}{\sqrt{3}}$

$is rotated about the origin by$ \ \ \frac{\pi}{6} \ \ $radians$

$Find an expression for the distance from a variable point on the curve$

$to the origin, and using the method above, find the area sweeped out$

---

Not sure if I 'proved' the method correctly lol

Sy123 · Oct 12, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Here is a good one:

$Let$ \ \ p(x) \ \ $be an even degree polynomial with a positive leading co-efficient such that$

$p(x) - p''(x) \geq 0 \ \ \ \ $for all real values of$ \ \ x$

$$Prove that$ \ \ p(x) \geq 0$

JJ345 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sy123 said:
Here is a good one:

$Let$ \ \ p(x) \ \ $be an even degree polynomial with a positive leading co-efficient such that$

$p(x) - p''(x) \geq 0 \ \ \ \ $for all real values of$ \ \ x$

$$Prove that$ \ \ p(x) \geq 0$

Let p(x) have its minimum value point at Q.
So p(x)>= p(Q) (1)
p(Q)>=p''(Q) ...given (2)
p''(Q)>=0 (because its the concavity at the min point of even degree positive coeff. polynomial)...(3)
So combining (1), (2) & (3)
We get that p(x)>=0

I think my (3) is pretty dodgy...

Sy123 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

JJ345 said:
Let p(x) have its minimum value point at Q.
So p(x)>= p(Q) (1)
p(Q)>=p''(Q) ...given (2)
p''(Q)>=0 (because its the concavity at the min point of even degree positive coeff. polynomial)...(3)
So combining (1), (2) & (3)
We get that p(x)>=0

I think my (3) is pretty dodgy...

That is the sketch of the proof, but can you explain why we get the conclusion from (1) (2) and (3)?

JJ345 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sy123 said:
That is the sketch of the proof, but can you explain why we get the conclusion from (1) (2) and (3)?

I don't get what you want me to explain.
Like actually define a polynomial and then do some random algebra or just explain what I did in more words?

Sy123 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

JJ345 said:
I don't get what you want me to explain.
Like actually define a polynomial and then do some random algebra or just explain what I did in more words?

Wait yea nevermind my method was a little different to yours, it involved a proof by contradiction (kinda).
Well done
---

$A function is defined for$ \ \ x,y > 0 \ \ $such that$

$f(xy) = f(x) + f(y)$

$$If$ \ \ f'(1) = 3 \ \ $find$ \ \ f(x)$

Sy123 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

$Evaluate (which you may assume converges)$

$\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^n \left(1+ \frac{k}{n} \right) \right)^{1/n}$

(can definitely be done within syllabus)

RealiseNothing · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sy123 said:
$Evaluate (which you may assume converges)$

$\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^n \left(1+ \frac{k}{n} \right) \right)^{1/n}$

(can definitely be done within syllabus)

You can prove that it converges easily as:

$(1+\frac{k}{n}) \leq 2$

$(2^n)^{\frac{1}{n}} = 2$

$\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^n \left(1+ \frac{k}{n} \right) \right)^{1/n} < 2$

Sy123 · Oct 13, 2013

Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

RealiseNothing said:
You can prove that it converges easily as:

$(1+\frac{k}{n}) \leq 2$

$(2^n)^{\frac{1}{n}} = 2$

$\lim_{n \to \infty} \left(\prod_{k=1}^n \left(1+ \frac{k}{n} \right) \right)^{1/n} < 2$

True (provided you can prove the product is not periodic) I didn't think about convergence anyway haha

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

This too shall pass

Member

This too shall pass

Member

This too shall pass

Well-Known Member

This too shall pass

New Member

New Member

This too shall pass

This too shall pass

This too shall pass

This too shall pass

Member

This too shall pass

Member

This too shall pass

This too shall pass

what is that?It is Cowpea

This too shall pass

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)