I solved it, but it's a pretty dirty solution lol. Anyway, better than nothing.Whoops, my first inequality is wrong . I still get the feeling that there is a short solution from that first expression though, I will try again after netball.
No, I wish!
Comparing degrees we get deg(P)^2 = k*deg(P).Another one, I can post my solution to the last question if requested:
Don't reveal the substitution, that takes all the fun away :/Yeah lol so like no one seems to be responding to the integration marathon so i thought i might post it here.
For the second integral there's a hint that the substitution would help, but you could use another method if you can come up with one
Here was my solution:I solved it, but it's a pretty dirty solution lol. Anyway, better than nothing.
By the sine rule (this isn't always stated as part of the sine rule, but it is easy to prove with HSC circle geometry):
So, making the substitutions: we get
So it is sufficient to show that the second factor in this last line is smaller that 1.
Comparing degrees we get deg(P)^2 = k*deg(P).
So solutions are either constant or of degree k.
For k=0 P=1 is trivially the only solution. For k=1, any constant is a solution. For k > 1, the only constant solutions are 0 and 1.
We can now assume k > 0 and just look for the non-constant solutions (which must be of degree k).
Write
with
Putting this in the original equation we get
By degree considerations, this forces a=1 (if the first term is nonzero, nothing in the second is of high enough degree to cancel it out) and then Q=0.
So the only such non-constant solution is
Isn't the function that is 1 at 0 and 0 elsewhere a non-constant solution?
Ah yes I meant continuousIsn't the function that is 1 at 0 and 0 elsewhere a non-constant solution?
What I can prove though, is that the only continuous solutions are constant.
Because if we let c:=f(0), then for x in (-1,1) we have
for any positive integer n. But for such x, which means by continuity that the RHS tends to c. As the LHS is constant in n, we are forced to conclude that this constant is c.
So we know that f(x)=c on the interval (-1,1). This also implies by continuity that f(1)=c.
We can do something similar with square roots to show that for x > 1, we have , so f(x) = c for all x >1 (so we have now shown that f(x) = c at all positive reals).
Finally, for negative x, x^2 is positive. So f(x)=f(x^2)=c.
Sure. Show that:Ah yes I meant continuous
And yes you got it (can you please post a problem)
Yes well doneα+β+γ=180 -> cot(α+β)=-cot(γ)
[cot(α)cot(β)-1]/[cot(α)+cot(β)] = -cot(γ)
cot(γ)/[cot(α)+cot(β)] = cot^2(γ)/[cot(α)cot(β)-1] = [-sin(α)sin(β)cos^2(γ)]/[sin^2(γ)cos(α+β)] = [sin(α)sin(β)cos(γ)]/sin^2(γ)
But, cos(γ) = [a^2+b^2-c^2]/2ab = [c^2(k-1)]/2ab (Given a^2+b^2=kc^2)
∴ cot(γ)/[cot(α)+cot(β)] = [c^2(k-1)sin(α)sin(β)]/[2absin^2(γ)]
Since sin(α)/a = sin(β)/a = sin(γ)/c;
cot(γ)/[cot(α)+cot(β)] = [c^2(k-1)]/2 x sin(γ)/c x sin(γ)/c x 1/sin^2(γ) = (k-1)/2
i) Suppose (for the sake of contradiction) that m is the least positive integer that cannot be written in base 2.Yes well done
from a brief look at this and a bit of brainstorming, would you use the property of the difference between two squares so like a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b) and then show that (17m^2+4n^2)-(17n^2+4m^2) cannot be expressed in that form?
It can be expressed in that form though.from a brief look at this and a bit of brainstorming, would you use the property of the difference between two squares so like a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b) and then show that (17m^2+4n^2)-(17n^2+4m^2) cannot be expressed in that form?
i might have a better look at this later