thanks mr obviousThere are currently 14 users browsing this thread.
thanks mreditorthanks mr obvious
btw on Tuesday, half of my grade was talking about you and your ceebsing for English and your concern only about BOS trials and nothing else etc. etc.thanks mreditor
it's climbing.
the anticipation is evident
we were? ._.btw on Tuesday, half of my grade was talking about you and your ceebsing for English and your concern only about BOS trials and nothing else etc. etc.
it was a hot topic of discussion :O
okay, not half of the grade. a bit of an exaggeration...we were? ._.
wtfbtw on Tuesday, half of my grade was talking about you and your ceebsing for English and your concern only about BOS trials and nothing else etc. etc.
it was a hot topic of discussion :O
it was relevant, as they were talking about your priorities, in particular how you have placed a lot of importance on BOS trials. so it is relevantwtf
edit: mods neg him for derail
penrithdimitri, mreditor, what schools?
I admit that the wording was somewhat ambiguous and open to interpretation.A game is played where probability of winning is p.
Let P(k) represent the probability of winning for the first time after playing k games.
Write down the expression for P(k) in terms of p and k
I interpreted this as winning a game after losing k games. How can I avoid this mistake next time? Is it me or the question?
Because it's like... winning a game AFTER playing k games I.e. after losing k games. :/
Interesting approach to that identity!
Haha no I didn't get the idea from that. I actually had this question hiding in my stash of questions for four years now.