Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon
Answer to part (a).What is the significance of this form?
Answer to part (a).What is the significance of this form?
So it's related to an existing question. I couldn't tell.Answer to part (a).
If you people needed a hint, break up the numerator (Using your intuition, not just willy-nilly!) and make a substitution, or manipulate the form.a) Differentiate
b) Hence or otherwise, solve
Computer Algebra Systems don't always find the elementary expression of an integrand, as there are integrals I know of which Wolfram Alpha cannot solve, but humans can. This is my go to place for these integrals. (P.S. I have quite a few left which I will continue to post as we progress)I am not entirely sure how your new question is solved though. But according to Wolfram, there is no solution for it.
Did that earlier and got 1+sqrt(1+x)/sqrt(1-x)If you people needed a hint, break up the numerator (Using your intuition, not just willy-nilly!) and make a substitution, or manipulate the form.
Computer Algebra Systems don't always find the elementary expression of an integrand, as there are integrals I know of which Wolfram Alpha cannot solve, but humans can. This is my go to place for these integrals. (P.S. I have quite a few left which I will continue to post as we progress)
Are you certain a minor mistake doesn't exist? By differentiating my answer and also looking at my notes, the integral can certainly be evaluated.Did that earlier and got 1+sqrt(1+x)/sqrt(1-x)
Im not sure where the substitution comes from but this is what I did:If you people needed a hint, break up the numerator (Using your intuition, not just willy-nilly!) and make a substitution, or manipulate the form.
Computer Algebra Systems don't always find the elementary expression of an integrand, as there are integrals I know of which Wolfram Alpha cannot solve, but humans can. This is my go to place for these integrals. (P.S. I have quite a few left which I will continue to post as we progress)
Heres our over 70 for BOS trials.Im not sure where the substitution comes from but this is what I did:
Ahah yeah probs :LHeres our over 70 for BOS trials.
This is similar to a previous question you asked.Ahah yeah probs :L
LOL this is more my levelFairly easy goer here.
Solve:
Ahahahaha.... We both know what to do here it seems.Hey Paradoxica, here are a few integrals for your integration bank:
I have a feeling you will be able to solve them
A Combination of Intuition, Experience, Hindsight and Luck. Symbolic Integration is an Art, not a Science. Numerical Integration is a Science. Specifically a Computer Science. Okay I'll stop Misusing Definitions now.How do people know to substitute something like:
I see the consequence of it (Ekman's soln) after some manipulation of the integrand but I've seen people use it straight away. I guess they've completed the manipulation mentally..A Combination of Intuition, Experience, Hindsight and Luck. Symbolic Integration is an Art, not a Science. Numerical Integration is a Science. Specifically a Computer Science. Okay I'll stop Misusing Definitions now.
Finally a question which isn't completely nutsFairly easy goer here.
Solve:
With enough practise, you learn to be able to do that in your head. It's like mental arithmetic, only vastly more impressive, because there are plenty of things that can go wrong, and no methodical process for arbitrary symbolic integration.I see the consequence of it (Ekman's soln) after some manipulation of the integrand but I've seen people use it straight away. I guess they've completed the manipulation mentally..
Yeah, the mathematical intuition required to see that division is quite spectacular!With enough practise, you learn to be able to do that in your head. It's like mental arithmetic, only vastly more impressive, because there are plenty of things that can go wrong, and no methodical process for arbitrary symbolic integration.