Well i'll see how this speech goes, if I get in that high band5/band 6 range I'll talk to my teacher about it aswell.
But the content doesn't get carried on at all from prelim, at least that's what I've been told. I mean the only thing that I can think of that is carried is the extent of the analytical/critical thinking skills learned during prelim - stuff along those lines. That probably is the major difference between the two, and when I look at the upcoming assessments this year, the descriptions/questions are almost identical. So I think it'll just come down to how much time and effort I'm willing to put into it.
Someone give me some guidance if I'm wrong.
It doesn't in English but unfortunately that is irrelevant. Especially since English advanced do slightly more demanding modules that require questions to be approached in a different manner.
Take Module B. Close study of text is kind of obvious as to what that asks you. But the Critical study of text actually forces you to make a very distinct evaluation throughout your essay in that it is
your interpretation of the text.
Module A can't really be compared (irony coming). Experience through language, be it distinctive voices or distinctively visual as opposed to Comparative study of text and context, be it intertextual connections or intertextual perspectives, both have an area of focus. But the comparative study gives you TWO related texts for starters (instead of asking for one related). It also calls forth context to be demanding as it is in the actual name of the module. Additionally, the electives are on completely different levels.
Whilst the marking is similar, unfortunately the nature of the courses differ quite noticeably and much more experience is gained through advanced to drop than from standard to move up.