• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2016 MX2 Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

are you sure it can even have a maximum value? Its a min parabola ?
If I try straightforwardly using the triangle inequality directly I get a complex modulus. This is mathematically invalid.

There has to be a corollary involved.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

Max occurs when equal



, we can do this because |z|>0, and |z|=0 is an irrelevant solution.

letting a = |z| just coz.

Finding the derivative

When
Since |z|>0, second derivative = a which is positive; hence max T.P. at |z|=1/2
Try again. The answer is not a rational number.
 
Last edited:

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

I've done this without the triangle inequality. Confirming the answer is 1 + sqrt 3.

It also has a minimum value: sqrt 3 - 1
So there is something wrong with the sign in that working.
 

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

I've done this without the triangle inequality. Confirming the answer is 1 + sqrt 3.

It also has a minimum value: sqrt 3 - 1
So there is something wrong with the sign in that working.
Oh yeah, damn, modulus can't be negative. So the correct solution would've read
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

Oh yeah, damn, modulus can't be negative. So the correct solution would've read
Actually, that reasoning will not do.
If that was correct working, you would have to interpret your answer as 0 <= |z| <= .....
I haven't checked the working, but there must be an error there somewhere.
 

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

Actually, that reasoning will not do.
If that was correct working, you would have to interpret your answer as 0 <= |z| <= .....
I haven't checked the working, but there must be an error there somewhere.
No, I got that. I know you can't just throw absolute value signs everywhere :p

I meant that if I worked it out properly, that would've been equivalent to the solution.
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

Alternative solution without directly using the triangle inequality:

Let z = r cis theta and substitute.

Rearrange to write cos^2 theta in terms of r.

Then using the fact that 0 <= cos^2 theta <= 1, solve the resulting inequality to find the range for r^2 and hence for r.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

A downwards force is not a "lateral" force.

Edit - yes, I know what you mean now.
It's referring to the force up and down the plane, right (like in the direction of friction forces in these Q's that have friction)?
 

hedgehog_7

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
50
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 4U Marathon

Given P ( a cos theta , b sin theta ) and Q ( a cos phi , b sin phi ) lie on the ellipse x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1

IF PQ subtends a right angle at (a,0) show that ( tan theta/2 ) X ( tan phi/2 ) = -b^2/a^2

How does b (sin theta - sin phi ) / a (cos theta - cos phi) = b/a * ( 2 sin ( (theta - phi) /2 ) ) ) * cos ( theta + phi /2 ) ) / - 2 sin ( (theta - phi) /2 ) ) sin (theta + phi /2 )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top