MedVision ad

HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I did it a kinda similar way, but with just a lot of substitutions (I like substitutions okay).

That is a very nice way of doing it, I only refer to inverse hyperbolic functions because I can be bothered saying log(insertshithere).
I don't use hyperbolic subs since it's not in the syllabus, but if it was, I would not hold back for even one second.



 
Last edited:

omegadot

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
230
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Of course developing and using the hyperbolic functions indirectly in any given question could be expected, but employing a hyperbolic substitution straight off the bat in order to find an integral is what I was really asking about.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Of course developing and using the hyperbolic functions indirectly in any given question could be expected, but employing a hyperbolic substitution straight off the bat in order to find an integral is what I was really asking about.
Yeah, these aren't in the syllabus.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Go to uni, start using hyperbolic functions everywhere... probably me...
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Btw, is there like a next question?
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Surely I've seen this before



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon



Mistake: Factorised the perfect square wrongly so when I took square roots one of the positive absolute value cases should've been a negative


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top