Re: Flop math question thread
I keep getting a power to 3, instead of 2 to solve for quadratic.
I keep getting a power to 3, instead of 2 to solve for quadratic.
Your method wasn't actually quite correct. This is because the events of pairs having different birthdays are not independent events, so we can't just multiply the probabilities like that. If we could just multiply them like that, we'd always have a non-zero probability of having no pairs with same birthday (just like there's always a non-zero probability of getting no tails from a set of coin tosses). But clearly if we had 366 people in the room, we always will have a pair with same birthdays, by the pigeonhole principle.I used the example with a probability value of 0.9975 when it should have been 0.9995, that changes the answer fairly significantly.
Well I haven't done enough questions like this so whilst I considered the relationship between the golden ratio and it's square both having √5/2 I overlooked the rewriting of the expressionStop giving hints.
I expect everyone to know the quadratic relation of the golden ratio. I have few standards, but assumed knowledge is one of them.Well I haven't done enough questions like this so whilst I considered the relationship between the golden ratio and it's square both having √5/2 I overlooked the rewriting of the expression
(3+√5)/2 = 1 + (1+√5)/2 went over my head because I forgot the exact thing Drsoccerball mentioned just nowI expect everyone to know the quadratic relation of the golden ratio. I have few standards, but assumed knowledge is one of them.
Golden ratio shouldn't even be known by a good extension 2 student.(3+√5)/2 = 1 + (1+√5)/2 went over my head because I forgot the exact thing Drsoccerball mentioned just now
That being said however, whilst it may have been bad that I forgot it, I hope you're not gonna say that to every 3U student out there.
Part (a) was easy because I remembered this
Part (a) was easy because I remembered this
Yes I'm well aware of the proof using that form lol. But I only remembered the quadratic equation cause I did a bit of reading on transcendental numbers the other day and noted how the golden ratio was not one.
I decided to stop making new threads to ask my endless maths questions, so here we are!
Inspired by leehuan's SOS thread