MedVision ad

leehuan's All-Levels-Of-Maths SOS thread (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

parad0xica

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
204
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Let's start here



Apply triangle-inequality to get







where delta is something...

Paradoxica, use your magnificent algebraic manipulation skills :p
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
@Drsoccerball that -1 can only be dropped for limits to infinity and we also have like some polynomial or something left.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Let's start here



Apply triangle-inequality to get







where delta is something...

Paradoxica, use your magnificent algebraic manipulation skills :p
That's not right. The two should be on top if you were using double angle.



And if you did the algebraic conversion, then it should be



It is only one or the other. Not both.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
To deal with the -1, use the triangle inequality as shown by parad0xica.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015

parad0xica

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
204
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
That's not right. The two should be on top if you were using double angle.



And if you did the algebraic conversion, then it should be



It is only one or the other. Not both.
Thanks for reminding the second time. I thought I remembered my double angles...

G-d damn I keep forgetting that the triangle inequality is now an ASSUMED result at uni.

But wait you still didn't address the problem with statement A
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1-cos(x)=2sin^2(x/2)

Though my instinct tells me that it will be negligible
Thanks. Yep, it wouldn't do much harm because we will then use triangle-inequality!
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
That doesn't look correct. The corollary of the triangle inequality does not state |a-b| < |a|-|b|

the closest I know of is ||x|-|y||<|x-y|

But that contradicts what you suppose.
What if I replaced that - with a + keeping in mind |-1|=1

And reverse signs everywhere else where appropriate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top